The smashed storefronts and burned buildings are as likely to be agent provocateurs as actual protestors, noted by the lack of rioting and burning in the vast majority of protests.
Straight up conspiracy theory. You just want to blame cops for everything bad. "It was a guy in a t-shirt! That's what cops (undercover) wear! Don't you see???" No, dude, it was a guy in a t-shirt. If anything, there was political motivation, not motivation from being a cop. Look to militias or Trumpists - maybe. You'll have to show some evidence to back up that, until then it's nonsense.
This is bizarre, you bring up the organized crime bogeyman against removing police, when it is actually an argument put forth by pro-police forces to discourage people seriously considering their removal
And here you reveal your motivation to dismiss anything based on its source without considering the merits, aka the genetic fallacy. Yes, pro-police forces put this argument forth, and it also happens to be a good and correct argument, which we can easily corroborate by looking at nations in history where centralized policing failed. This is not a defense of police, it is saying that they are, in this case, making a point to consider. If you have historical evidence to the contrary, we could discuss it, but it will be heavily outweighed from the start.
and you point out the nature of american plutocracy which is kept in place in large part by police keeping the masses from pitchforking rich folk but act like we could somehow level out the playing field before fixing the police state when the police state exists explicitly to prevent us from leveling out the playing field?
The police are just the hired help my man. I'm on your side, but you're thinking small. You don't fix a bad mayor by punching out the garbage man, unless you plan to go through the entire house wrecking everything in your way until you get to him. The fish stinks from the head, as they say.