Isn't standing up for him, without any evidence that other people can see, something that scum/tied people would do, too?
...Presumably, yeah.
However I did state the grounds of which I stood up for him by. If scum, I wouldn't...err, obviously be outed like that, nor would I want to--whenever I play scum, I go subterfuge. This, ain't subterfuge (also considering that we can resurrect.. -_-). Next, tied people. I wouldn't go the same path in being tied by outing myself.
'Tied' could, however, apply in this scenario. We seem to have mirror skills and a mirror theme. Fragility, and yet Elasticity. Though I had no idea there was someone akin to me in this game given my alignment and my abilities present.
...
Oh goodness xD I just...
MC: You can't vote, right? :3
Ok, I'll just be laughing here to myself at the moment. Yeah, I now have truly guessed all 3 abilities that he claimed.
Anyways, yes, I understand you only have my word and his contending with how to consider us, but realize that...
1. I'm pretty harmless unless provoked [ie I can't do mostly anything]
2. There's a mirror theme between MC and I. However, I didn't know about this. Unsure on his side.
3. I know he's pretty harmless
unless killed.4. Yeah, people can act post-death. But I believe this only extends to us 2? It's...I'm emphasizing the 'fragility' aspect of this.
5. Everything else I said before this post is true. Except the capitals. Think of the capitals as that crazy voice in your head whenever you have visions of glory.
Hmm. Poke me aside, Cheese.
> 1 is an auto.
> 1 is an ability.
> 1 is a...role. As in its the only [thing] pertaining to the role.
I can add a player to the game. There's no hint about alignment in the description, so I assume that they become town. Due to spectators being able to take limited action (voting for stuff only), how about choosing a player for them to either vote or control to indicate that they want to play?
My first impression = That Priest role from Supernatural ._.
TDS IS A SUMMONER. MAGICK! MAGICK! IT IS BAD!