Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Chevaleresse]

I was playing as AN ADAMANTINE COLOSSUS.

[ComatosePhoenix]

I'd double check your raws to make sure you set it up correctly, unless toady snuck something in there to make adamantine creatures killable.

[Chevaleresse]

I'd double check your raws to make sure you set it up correctly, unless toady snuck something in there to make adamantine creatures killable.

I posted in the modding forum about it. Presumably it should be all right, since bronze colossi (also presumably, I haven't fought one yet) don't lose limbs to kicks. It does seem to be an issue with general fragility rather than bogeymen being OP, since I fought some gobbos with another one and a bash(!) severed my hand. Later, that colossus also fell to bogeymen, with one hit punching away the same lower arm and another removing a leg.

[Sarrak]

Colossi have strangely slim connections between bodyparts. The best weapons to sever their limbs in 0.34 were spears and pikes (of better material then bronze) and they could be bisected with an arrow.

[Chevaleresse]

After fixing them to actually have tissues, they are quite literally immortal in combat. Nothing can damage an adamantine colossus, not even another adamantine colossus wielding an adamantine zweihander. Arrows are similarly ineffective.

[Shizmoo]

Well ya you are made of admantine......

[random_odd_guy]

After fixing them to actually have tissues, they are quite literally immortal in combat. Nothing can damage an adamantine colossus, not even another adamantine colossus wielding an adamantine zweihander. Arrows are similarly ineffective.

My own modding experience can attest to this. Protip: creating civs of such creatures is a bad idea, as you will inevitably get tons of quests to kill them and not be able to for you can only engage in an endless battle

[Rumrusher]

which is why it's best to make a weapon only the adventurer can make that made of better than adamantine.

[Orange Wizard]

Anti-adamantine? Antadamantine? Antimantine?

Antimantine. 

[smjjames]

Anti-adamantine? Antadamantine? Antimantine?

Antimantine. 

Wouldn't anti-adamantine be the antimatter version of adamantine?

[lue]

Wh- what. . . how. . . I don't even know how to express my feelings about this.

It was inevitable.

Y'know, because that's DF's "I don't know anything better to say" response...

[Orange Wizard]

Anti-adamantine? Antadamantine? Antimantine?

Antimantine. 

Wouldn't anti-adamantine be the antimatter version of adamantine?

Look, don't get your quarks in a tangle. I know my nucleon physics and antepasta has nothing to do with it.

[Lightningy]

Anti-adamantine? Antadamantine? Antimantine?

Antimantine. 

Wouldn't anti-adamantine be the antimatter version of adamantine?

Look, don't get your quarks in a tangle. I know my nucleon physics and antepasta has nothing to do with it.

the rules of quantum trepidation state that photosynthesis orichalicium is prototypical bonded with the tyrannosaurus of the square of a Pythagoras's parabola dues exmachina of the dragonic peninsula.

[Orange Wizard]

Anti-adamantine? Antadamantine? Antimantine?

Antimantine. 

Wouldn't anti-adamantine be the antimatter version of adamantine?

Look, don't get your quarks in a tangle. I know my nucleon physics and antepasta has nothing to do with it.

the rules of quantum trepidation state that photosynthesis orichalicium is prototypical bonded with the tyrannosaurus of the square of a Pythagoras's parabola dues exmachina of the dragonic peninsula.

Exactly! See, this guy gets it.

[lue]

Since it's "add-amantine", and "remove" is the opposite of "add", rmamantine ("remove-amantine")?