PFP
I think the extension should have happened, if it could have.
Cheeetar was the 10th voter for an extend. We just need a majority, that's 9. I think the extension did happen.
No votecount was provided before flabort was killed.
Previous wubba BYOR games start of night have shown fluff followed by votecount followed by result of vote. Start of games have shown fluff followed by kills/revives/whatever followed by the votecount.
The page set up resembles a day start, not a day end (or an extend).
We're still listed as on day 1. I think the vote cancellation happened before flabort was killed, which is why votes were not shown before his death. We were not shown -why- he was killed. More specifically, we were not shown that he was lynched.
And we usually are, if that's what killed them.
From wubba's last BYOR, a lynch death:
TolyK has been lynched!
A kill (happened to be a nightkill) target:
Hapah has been killed!
I believe flabort was killed, not lynched. I do not know how, if it is self-targeted or other. But that was not a lynch; he would have been called 'lynched' not 'killed' if he had been lynched. I believe the day would have ended had we not had enough extension votes. I can not tell if the vote clearing is directly connected to the kill but I suspect it is, Occam's Razor.
Flabort.
For one: Why do you believe Varee's 'house' to be a beneficial thing? You seem to completely believe 1) that this 'housebuilding' exists. 2) That it is beneficial to recieve it.
For two: You said you planned to target Toaster. Was that 'if' you did not instead target Varee's target? Or did you say that because you offered Toaster as a Varee target, because Toaster had said he would not mind?
For three: You seem to completely disregard that you have an additional way to gain Varee's 'house', which would be the normal way; to be targeted by Varee for building it but to 'not' target Varee back; in fact don't use your 'Latvian Dream' power at all that night. Why do you appear to not even consider this option even slightly?
For four: If you target Varee as Varee targets you, this makes -you- immune to incoming powers, however it would make Varee's power unblockable. Is immunity a form of block? Have you already asked Webadict about an outcome to this?
For five: Why did you pick Toaster to target?
For six:
Cheetar, Toaster, Varee, IronyOwl: Did one of you do this?
Why did you specifically ask those people instead of asking everyone?
You may have already explained this, I am work pressured and must go back to my work extremely soon and cannot further read/reread. But please explain why Cheeetar got your vote here and now. You had not even been voting for him before the vote reset, you'd been voting for Shakerag. How did Cheeetar jump to the top of your list?
For Six: Wait a sec. You just got 'killed', sort of at least. The second person you ask if they did it, is Toaster. And you're recommending Toaster gets Varee's 'house', and you just explained that you intended to target Toaster with your huge buff.
THis seems senseless.
Explain your thinking, please. Turn this into sense.
Everyone:
I suspect that Varee cannot actually 'give' someone a 'house' without consent. I view Varee's behavior with grave suspicion and am concerned that there's some unusual interconnection between Varee and Flabort. I suggest that noone give Varee consent. Varee started acting like this when he started to gain votes. I believe this act of Varee's is not a friendly act, and that Varee -wants- consent way to much, and he started determinedly seeking it it only under pressure. If Varee could just pick anyone to target for the house, I believe he would, if he doesn't in fact want to just randomly 'give' it. He could select -anyone-, including anyone he may like or trust (he said he had no suspicions); instead he wants consent, and that started only under pressure. Be wary.
Author
Topic: BYOR 13 - Game Over: Thirteen (Read 259566 times)