Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[IcyTea31]

I really hope you're not being serious with those statistics. For one, statistics don't quite work that way, and for two, if everybody over nine watched porn at least once a week, the alarmists wouldn't bother saying 80%, they'd say "ALL CHILDREN WATCH PORN ERMAHGERD".

[bloop_bleep]

I really hope you're not being serious with those statistics. For one, statistics don't quite work that way, and for two, if everybody over nine watched porn at least once a week, the alarmists wouldn't bother saying 80%, they'd say "ALL CHILDREN WATCH PORN ERMAHGERD".

I'm assuming age is evenly distributed, and that children are people in the age range of 0-18 years. Which means 25% of children are under 4.5 years and 75% are over 4.5 years. By Pigeonhole Principle, even if everybody over the age of 4.5 watched porn every week, that only accounts for 75% out of 80% -- meaning the 5% that are left over have to be in the "under 4.5" group. This means that at least 5% of children are both under 4.5 years and watch porn every week. Because 25% percent of children are under 4.5 years, at least 5%/25%=1/5=20% of children under 4.5 years watch porn every week. See the problem?

[Eric Blank]

Can hear the horse snoring out in the pasture. Stupid happy horse

[IcyTea31]

See the problem?

Yeah, I misread the original statement.

[Rose]

Today's devlog.

[Helgoland]

I'm assuming age is evenly distributed, and that children are people in the age range of 0-18 years. Which means 25% of children are under 4.5 years and 75% are over 4.5 years. By Pigeonhole Principle, even if everybody over the age of 4.5 watched porn every week, that only accounts for 75% out of 80% -- meaning the 5% that are left over have to be in the "under 4.5" group. This means that at least 5% of children are both under 4.5 years and watch porn every week. Because 25% percent of children are under 4.5 years, at least 5%/25%=1/5=20% of children under 4.5 years watch porn every week. See the problem?

That's a strange application of the pigeonhole principle - on a percentage level the amount of kids takes a continuous value, but when pigeonholing you go back to treating them as discrete entities. I think you're implicitly (accidentally) assuming that the total number of kids is divisible by twenty

(/nitpicking)

[SalmonGod]

Woman On Tinder Date Gets Trapped In Window Disposing Of Poop That Wouldn't Flush

[Akura]

Oh shit!

Cool on the guy for taking her out on a second date though.

Also, protip on unflushable turds: dump a bucket of water down when you flush. That's what we had to do before we replaced our toilet.

[Loud Whispers]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

[EnigmaticHat]

Woman On Tinder Date Gets Trapped In Window Disposing Of Poop That Wouldn't Flush

you fucked up so badly

[Derpy Dev]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

What is this? What? Excuse me? WHY IS THIS POST TREATING THAT LIKE IT'S COMMON?

I don't know why I'm laughing xD

[Loud Whispers]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

What is this? What? Excuse me? WHY IS THIS POST TREATING THAT LIKE IT'S COMMON?

I don't know why I'm laughing xD

Anarcho-Capitalist memes, second one is also Belgium themed

[Tawa]

Sweden Simulator

[Loud Whispers]

Sweden Simulator

So immersive
Can't wait for ikea dlc

[Arx]

Spoiler: For context, my name is Daričn (click to show/hide)

I read the title, and it was mildly humourous. Then I read the subtitle and I cracked up.