One possibility is that there was a cross-kill on Jack. He was hardly a unlikely choice, considering that pretty much everyone thought he was town. I see no reason for a Necromancer to not kill, given that the zombie kill is pretty much untraceable back to him- whoever blew up Jack may simply have done so before the zombie could go make a mess of him.
But the flavor would tell us if Jack was targeted by a kill from two sources, unless everything I think I know about Meph games isn't true.
Meph, if a player is a kill target from two different sources, the flavor will indicate this, correct?
It sounds plausible, but three thirds isn't a lot more then normal. Maybe there's only a 1 or 2 person scumteam, but I doubt there wouldn't be any scumteam.
Three killer third parties would be more than usual, though.
Yes, but Jim was specifically saying that that isn't how revives work in Supernatural games. All revives are one-shots, and the last time a revive failed, the person was able to reuse it the next night.
I talked to Meph about this.
If IG's power worked like a priest did, where the resurrection always happens but what they come back as is not certain, then this is the case; IG's revive would not be used up.
If IG's power didn't work like a priest, i.e., if on failure the corpse does not get revived and 'something bad' happens, then it's possible that both ToonyMan and IG can target the same corpse and have the role situation we are currently debating, where both their one-shots are consumed.
But I also asked Meph if a random-targeting kill was a potential result of a 'something bad' happening, and he said it was possible but unlikely, and any negative result from revive failure would usually target either the performer or the receiver. But these are by no means hard and fast rules, he said.
This leads me to think that IG's role isn't really what he claimed, and my accusation that he's a killer who uses dead (town) corpses to power a kill.
Author
Topic: Supernatural 7 - Game over - Town Win! (Read 195355 times)