Jack, you just seem simply too gung ho for Day 1. While my attacks were to get you to spill the beans and let me know about you, yours were just to get me killed, because you are either overconfident ( WHICH IS A SCUMTELL. ) or scum. You may also very well be a third party, and I have my eyes on you. Nobody knows ANYTHING D1 and this is the time to ask questions, scan posts and playstyle, and think. The power roles will help us day 2, and give us some basis and some alibi before we start the debate again.
Imperial Guardsman: Thank you for explaining your read. You're wrong, but at least now I know what makes you wrong. See, here's the thing. You're right that at the start of Day 1, there's an utter lack of public information. However, every post anyone makes adds information to the public's eye. Most starting stuff (RVS) is not very informative, but it is information. Attacks, like your initial one, are more information. I asked you questions. You gave information. I asked more questions. I got more info. Then Persus came in, attacked you, and you leapt away from your initial attack.
So I applied pressure. Increasing pressure, to get information. And the information I have acquired is quite alarming.
What makes you believe that my questions and eventual attacks were purely to kill you? In your reading of theory that you love to throw around, have you ever seen any references to a "pressure vote"?
PPE X ARGH ARGH ARGH ARGH ARGH ARGH:
Unvote for now. Kingmaker 4 flashbacks en masse have led me to believe that I need to reevaluate. (I'm noticing, across multiple games, that there seems to be something about my votes that makes inexperienced players break down)
<readlist snipped>
Flabort: That's nice and all, but can you explain these reads? I've seen your process before, but dumping a list of numbers isn't very helpful without reasons.