MOWE:1. You are the most suspicious person in the short time we've been playing. I took the question to mean "suspicious" instead of just "scummy" at this point. And I'm more suspicious of you because you're dodging questions about your reasonings. Note the "especially" in my reasoning.
What's the difference between "suspicious" and "scummy"?
Reaction-fishing doesn't work if you immediately tell people what you're doing. I didn't have the results I wanted yet, so I left a vague question-answer. You must have a pretty low opinion of me if you think that was an accidental slip.
Why is it more likely that a mafia would do that than a town? When you're looking for suspects, ask that question instead of comparing their actions to a list of scumtells. Right now you're being lazy and going for an easy target.
2. I am now! I assumed the voting of yourself might also be something to do with your role, but now you're twisting things around. (see 3)
Yes, but why didn't you use your vote in that post if I was suspicious? You weren't voting anyone else.
3. That was me seperating the question. I was asked about two scenarios: as princess and as town. I said "As princess, x" and "As town, x." to clearly mark which answer belonged to which part of the question. I just try to make things obvious to prevent confusion and make things easier for future read throughs. This is scummy how?
It makes you look like you're thinking from the perspective of non-town, but it's just semantics anyway. Just something to press you on.
Toony:@TheWetSheep:
Sheep
Voting yourself is dumb. Voting yourself to catch scum is dumber. What do you expect to accomplish with this besides tricking newbie town?
Catch scum? It's to start conversation. It's worked better than a bunch of hypotheticals so far.
Do you think your vote on a lurker is going to get them to respond faster?
TDS:I will try not to die. I'll also answer RVS questions.
You won't ask them? Or do any type of scumhunting?