Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Bay 12 fighter unit should be...

IJNAF elite A6M2 Zero unit Chitose Ku S-1 or its detachments or division(s)
- 3 (42.9%)
a IJAAF Ki-43 unit in Indochina, to be used in China/East Indies(mostly)
- 1 (14.3%)
a IJAAF Ki-43 unit in Burma(at least initially)
- 3 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 7

Voting closed: May 04, 2014, 08:49:03 am


Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26

Author Topic: War in the Pacific: PBEM, apparently closed, see last posts  (Read 39456 times)

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #360 on: July 28, 2014, 07:17:03 am »

March 16, 1942


China: IJA starts its flanking maneuver near Sian. A division is moving to block the Sian-Yenan road in rough terrain and cut off the commies. More force moving down the road the Chinese probably have no idea of.

Ground combat at 85,33 (near Ningsia)
 
Japanese Deliberate attack
 
Attacking force 3480 troops, 26 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 127
 
Defending force 413 troops, 17 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1
 
Japanese adjusted assault: 120
 
Allied adjusted defense: 3
 
Japanese assault odds: 40 to 1
 
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
 
Japanese ground losses:
      12 casualties reported
         Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
         Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
         Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
 
Allied ground losses:
      201 casualties reported
         Squads: 3 destroyed, 0 disabled
         Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 2 disabled
         Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
      Guns lost 17 (17 destroyed, 0 disabled)
      Units retreated 1
 
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
 
Assaulting units:
    11th Indpt Infantry Regiment
 
Defending units:
    81st Chinese Corps


Not much left of that Corps...

Burma: IJAAF bombs the retreating British, and today Hurricanes fly CAP. Ki-43s shoot down 3 of them and lose 2 of their own(1 pilot) and the British fighters again waltz through the escorts and shoot down 7 single-engine bombers. I'm moving out all the good aircrew from those units and will start using replacements pilots instead... They're only supposed to slow down the withdrawing British units, so hitting isnt necessary. Not that 30kg bombs do much damage any way.

DEI: G3M bombers with Zero escorts hit Soerabaja's port and destroy lots of small ships and a submarine! Recon reports another sub in the port so one more bombing is ordered. If that sub was in anything but readiness repairs it'll take 3 days to get it going again.

Morning Air attack on Soerabaja , at 56,104
 
Weather in hex: Partial cloud
 
Raid detected at 31 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes
 
Japanese aircraft
      A6M2 Zero x 15
      G3M2 Nell x 41
 
Japanese aircraft losses
      G3M2 Nell: 2 damaged
 
Allied Ships
      AMc Ardjoeno, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      SS KXV, Bomb hits 7, and is sunk
      xAKL Benkalis, Bomb hits 2,  heavy fires,  heavy damage
      HDML P 22, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      AMc Lawoe, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      HDML P 21, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      AMc Enggano, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      HDML P 7, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      AMc Merbabo, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      HDML P 17, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      ARD Soerabaja KM, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
      HDML P 19, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
      AMc Kawi, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
 
Port hits 8
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 1


South Pacific: Kido Butai finds a small 4-ship ASW TF at Suva, Fiji, not enough to launch a strike. Amphibious rescue TF evacuates SNLF 2nd China Assault Division from Efate - next stop Horn Island.

Submarines: IJN subs near Sydney skirmish with ASW TFs. CVL Charlotte still afloat. Intel reports her sunk for the 3rd time already.

Logged

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #361 on: July 30, 2014, 07:09:17 am »

March 17, 1942


China: Good news! A large enemy formation is leaving Hengyang towards Japanese-held Kukong. If I can abuse the IJ tactical awareness a bit I may be able to cut off this enemy force at some point in the coming weeks. Chinese fighters flew their first offensive sorties of the war when 5 Hawk 75Ms appeared over Kukong, that was today expanded enough to operate 2E bombers. I really hope that the Chinese will attempt to retake it.

Burma: Cruisers Mogami and Mikuma visit Akyab and sink the 4 ships found. 2 xAKs and 2 escorts.

Japanese Ships
      CA Mogami
      CA Mikuma
      DD Matsukaze
      DD Hakaze
 
Allied Ships
      PC Yarra, Shell hits 5, and is sunk
      KV Cyclamen, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
      xAK Mundra, Shell hits 21, and is sunk
      xAK Nils Moller, Shell hits 24, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk


RAF Blenheim bombers reappeared today as a squadron or so of them bombed Imperial Guards. 2 were shot down by the lone A6M3 in CAP.

IJA recon regiment reached and occupied Bhamo today. China is now on its own.

DEI: Bad weather again grounded attacks on Darwin. Didnt stop the Allied Catalinas and medium bombers from flying naval air search from there. Attack at Tarakan fails again...

PI: -

South Pacific: Quiet. Amphibious TF carrying and SNLF Assault Division makes it to open sea. DD Suzukaze collides with an AMC and becomes badly damaged... Just what was needed.

Submarines: IJN sub force doesnt find anything to attack bu ASW TFs. So 3 of the war's largest submarine torpedoes hit CVL Charlotte, that has a light cruiser's durability, out in the open sea, and failed to sink her. Torpedo hit and 8 bombs failed to sink CL Honolulu. 3 torpedoes failed to sink BB Ramillies. 4 bomb hits failed to sink a DD. IJN lost a CA of its own to 2 penetrating bomb hits. I cant wait to fight larger ships...

Logged

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #362 on: August 01, 2014, 02:06:52 pm »

March 18, 1942


CVL Charlotte confirmed sunk today!!

North Pacific: Catalinas have been flying over Paramushiro-Jima for days now. I doubt that Kuriles will be invaded this early. But if yes, Japan is already prepared and has some naval and lots of air assets in reserves nearby.

China: Chinese army keeps advancing from Hengyang. Excellent news. Chinese air force sorties to attack IJA troops nearby.

Burma: RAF doesn't fly.

Bay of Bengal: Invasion force advances... And what is probably a picket AMC is sighted in an adjacent hex!! Luckily carrier planes did not sortie and the Japanese are still hopefully unknown to the enemy.

DEI: Soerabaja bombed for the last time. Subs have been moved out, but 2 last small ships are hit and sunk.

South Pacific: Kido Butai disappears from the enemy.

Submarines: IJN subs attack enemy an TF with CA Pensacola and 2 Dutch light cruisers several times near Brisbane, but fail to get through the escorts. Many enemy DDs are out of depth charges. On the northern coast of Australia, an enemy xAK is hit and sunk. Probably a suicide supply runner to Darwin or Broome.

Logged

Chosrau

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #363 on: August 01, 2014, 02:54:31 pm »

Is the confirmation of CLV Charlotte sinking possibly false? You said Intel reported her sunk several times before.
Logged

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #364 on: August 01, 2014, 03:04:33 pm »

Is the confirmation of CLV Charlotte sinking possibly false? You said Intel reported her sunk several times before.

I'm sure yes, as today the intelligence thinks that CVL Hermes was sunk instead.  :P Also subs attacked Charlotte TF 4 or 5 times and revealed all the ships that had been in it(from what I know any way) except Charlotte. That TF also moved more than it had in the previous days so they're missing the ship that slowed it down. It could have been detached and given only a small escort but that wouldn't have made any sense in the sub-infested waters and great damage from torpedo hits.

Now I need to get the subs out before I start losing them. Thankfully Allied ASW efforts have been only half-hearted so far.
Logged

Anvilfolk

  • Bay Watcher
  • Love! <3
    • View Profile
    • Portuguese blacksmithing forum!
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #365 on: August 01, 2014, 03:31:21 pm »

Niiiiice, congratulations :D

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #366 on: August 02, 2014, 04:26:35 am »

So, 1 down, and how many to go?
Logged

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #367 on: August 02, 2014, 06:00:17 am »

So, 1 down, and how many to go?

Way too many.  :D  At the moment USN should have 5 CVs and a CVE while Royal Navy has CVL Hermes and I think 1 CV, an Illustrious class one.
Logged

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #368 on: August 05, 2014, 12:33:41 pm »

Looks like the rate of turns has went down considerably during the last 3 weeks or so. I'll be heading to a vacation trip day after the tomorrow and both game and the AAR will be on a pause until 24th.
Logged

Anvilfolk

  • Bay Watcher
  • Love! <3
    • View Profile
    • Portuguese blacksmithing forum!
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #369 on: August 05, 2014, 12:41:52 pm »

Normal Summer then! Have a great trip! :)

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #370 on: August 07, 2014, 06:06:59 am »

Have a nice trip!
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #371 on: August 22, 2014, 01:08:57 pm »

200 km of paddling on the Elbe, over a dozen of medieval castles, cathedrals and old towns and who knows how many schnitzels and beers  :P later I'm now back aboard the Travemunde-Helsinki ship!

Unfortunately it seems that I still haven't received the turn back and I may have lost my opponent once more. I'm sorry about that and it's a great disappointment to me as well as playing the game and doing an AAR is a lot of work and takes a good part of a day's spare time. I will try emailing him tomorrow but I fear that it may be futile. There has been communication between us so I dont know why he has not told me if he was having time management issues or lack of motivation.
Logged

Anvilfolk

  • Bay Watcher
  • Love! <3
    • View Profile
    • Portuguese blacksmithing forum!
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #372 on: August 22, 2014, 01:35:27 pm »

He's probably just doing his summer holiday things as well, hopefully! How long have you not heard from him?

Erkki

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #373 on: August 23, 2014, 02:10:54 am »

Well, not since the 4th day August 1...
Logged

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: War in the Pacific: yet another PBEM, here we go?
« Reply #374 on: August 23, 2014, 07:01:08 am »

 :'(
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26