Quick Query Ottofar, of all the things you point out--you point out those that are trivial.
I've made my own trail of errors...something which I notice you didn't tend to focus on:
> What about me asking Mastahcheese on his choice of pardon?
> My claim. Are you going to do anything about it?
On Tiruin, well. First vote in LyLo is often scum.
and...?
Back this up. This seemingly has merit.
Because I see many loopholes there.
Statistics, and aggression. At LyLo you'd be cautious if you weren't rushing to kill one last townie. Scum need to quickly end days, so they have less time to drop tells. I think, at least. That's why extensions were a town tell, until it became a null one.
Somewhere in the world, a nerve is pulled whenever someone says Statistics narrows to a best answer. It's a translation from qualitative or empirical data, to numbers, and back to qualitative data. Something which I see, lacks backing in this case.
Yeah I'm looking at you, NQT.If the first one to vote is scum at LyLo: Have you done anything about it?
*points at statistics*
You haven't.
At LyLo, I'd be cautious--yes--but that is only when I am unsure. Here? I am
doubly sure.
You may have noticed, that the dead speak, and by speak, I mean their actions. Can you dispute the power of the Force? The Jedi and his action? Can you dispute mastahcheese: his method of choice and the recent events?
Has anyone else claimed being the target of last night's kill? I see
nobody having done so but myself--something I expected, in the least, for you to attack (or mastahcheese, but he's clear).
Your
generalization of scum and scum behavior is
trivial, Ottofar. It is a blunt move designed to commit the illusion that that is what your target is doing instead of making a focused point on what exactly, or in the least specifically what the target is doing.
See here.
So that's what NAR means.
Hm. Well. If Ottofar isn't the KM, then cheese is and I'll be killing him tonight.
Well, this round is set.
Mastacheese, think about this: According to Tiruin's plan he's the only one alive tomorrow, and also the implication behind the statement: he's saying town will win if he's not lynched.
Double with him claiming just a cop, a sane cop first.
Firstly: She.
Secondly:
Give your list of reads.Thirdly: Appealing to the audience does not do any good--what's the use of the last statement that you've left undetailed? T'would be more gripping if you did.
Think about this: You may have noticed I proposed an ideal: having claimed Stalker instead of sticking to being a Cop, yet you haven't spoken about that. But I give merit where it is due: you propose what I say in direct contradiction to what your view is: the only point I give merit to because you have no other choice but to trust cheese?
Interesting.
Because NQT used the Force on me last night and I didn't do smurf (in which I'm a Cop--yeah, a Cop of the Sane variety: you could rationalize the use as mafia or as town or whatever,
Also, you do note that Tiruin has been extremely aggressive this day. He instantly jumps on every single thing I say, and doesn't really question much, merely belittles the tells.
Also, justifying aggression:
...You'll have to make a better case than that if you're really into the run of being King, Ottofar.
Someone with sincere conviction would've obviously voted either one of us by the start--sans Shakerag because he's a silly shovel.
No, well, yes, a scum who needs to quickly get the round over, before they can be questioned, before they drop a tell.
Tiruin
Hum...you quote a part, but not relate it to the first paragraph.
I'm extremely aggressive due foremost to me singling out one specific target of spurious value. 'Extremely aggressive' in your viewpoint because you feel trapped. Cornered. And broken in your train of thought. Have you noticed how I proceeded earlier? How I singled you out? I believe you did--and you're covering for it.
If I'm providing a smokescreen by my assertiveness, then I would love it if you replied in counter-force, instead of bringing up your own screen by the words of 'instantly', 'extremely' and other such superlative-functions.
The last part? Dubious and implausible value. Appeal to generalizing, to the irrational and animal fear that creates the first impulse in a situation. It's showing your fear.
Take note: Shakerag cannot vote. Three to hammer. You, I and Cheese can vote. Whatever I do--whatever I will do, the round cannot end 'quickly', and instead of create a plausible and believable case against me (I mean, take notes: I've done many errors--and which you do only generalizing to counter) you bring up nothing to bear.
It would be
hilarious if someone hammered themselves.
You're gripping your last straw.