Personally, I think lynching Cado will be more useful because any announcement from it will probably hint at which part was useful, if any. Also, if you lynched me, you'd also learn that "Hey, TheDarkStar told the truth!" too, which is not much different than what you'd get from Cado.
If this was the case, I expected to see arguments from either you or LS about the Non Evils being meteor summoners--I saw none, other than 'Hey, NQT is suspicious!'. Which is why I'm doubting the obvious-truths in why lynching Cado, over a similar Evil-claimant, would merit more of a benefit.
I mean, wat. Why would a meteor summoner claim? >__> The implications are crazy unless:
> He has something to gain from it.
> He wants to help. (You can't just give up)
> Some ability he has, would work in that scenario. So far I can't see any.
NQT is suspicious for his "You better not lynch me or else you all lose (but go ahead and lynch me after today), but seriously, there's nothing to ask. Really." attitude that makes it questionable if he actually has anything to say or if he is just a variant of a jester who only wins if lynched on or after day 2.
It's far to inappropriate as a general setting to conclude that NQT is a jester. The game could've taken any which way, and him being a jester is just darn weird.
In other words: "We voted a clown for president" is also bad. :c
PPE: x2
Woo! Support!
Tiruin:
It is, actually.
3 people claimed Evil. This denotes that 'hey, why would they claim if its all in truth? Pretty strange.'
What a Cado lynch says would bias against those who had the 'Evil' point in their PMs. "Evil; thus Meteor Summoner"
What either a TDS/LS lynch would confirm is 'Evil is a subjective point and some of the Non Evils lied' if they aren't summoners, and if they are...Well.
We don't know what, if anything, flips on death. Lynching Ranger has the advantage of testing multiple things. If he flips Evil, great, that must be what we're after. If he flips Meteor Summoner, ditto. If he doesn't flip at all, I ask for a replacement. (Not really, but I usually don't like no-flip games.)
Basically, what TDS said.
But it becomes a linear tie in. Consider why he claimed. Next, the 'we don't know' part is somewhat pulled up by flavor in page 5. That NQT has decision over the mass-vote. Which is, in the most rational way, why he's doing this promise-scheme.
1. Obviously, there are more meteor summoners; possibly some of these are ones who claim Not Evil (how many have claimed that, anyway?). Being evil and summoning the meteor are completely independent. Some evil people want to rule the world, not destroy it, and some Not Evil people could have been tricked/coerced/thought it was a good idea/see destroying the world as "good" (as in, the world is so bad it has to die, or (with a smaller meteor) the school of magic is too dangerous and has to be destroyed).
2. Why is voting a "clown" for the president so unusual? He bribed you guys (and girls), remember?
3. Check with the people who have not given role info yet to see if they are good or evil. I suspect that "evil" is a red herring because only one of us three evil people claims to have summoned the meteor (I can't vouch for LS, though).
4. Lynching Cado is useful because it checks two things at once rather than one. Also, as for why he claimed meteor summoner, could it be that the scum are just as confused as the town? Maybe Cado claimed because he wanted to check if he was scum or not? There's always the possibility of a jester-type role, but I don't see that as too likely; Cado comes across as simply confused (like most of us). Is Cado going to roleclaim more than "I'm not a wizard" soon?
5. Explain that last bit. NQT claims to have
no other abilities besides being confirmed Not Evil. He also acts suspicious about his claim of "something bad" and hasn't made a convincing claim that there is actually something besides "I can't tell you, but really, it's there."
Sorry about my rambling; I'm going to be gone for the next several hours and want to sum up my thoughts so far.