Toaster:
TolyK: Fair enough.
This is in response to... my reply to as why I'm here, right?
Tiruin:
TolyK
Tolyk:
If you were one of the assassins, and had to make the choice of whom to kill right now, who would it be? Why?
Huh. I could tell who I wouldn't (the King, since he's being very thoughtful ), but who I would kill... Jim? I don't really have all the information I need, but I'd be afraid of playing scum against Jim.
1. I see uncertainty, and I see Jim. Does Jim relevant to uncertainty?
2. Also why specifically Jim?
3. Also2: Anything on your mind or are you not curious on asking us things? What are your thoughts on the Kingmaker setup?
(1) Kinda - since I don't have information today, I would kill the guy I'd most be afraid of as scum. (2) He's that guy in this case, because he is very experienced and (afair) pointed me out as scum way too easily. >.> Also, as he said, he's usually strongly condemning and pushing, which really gets my on the edge regardless of faction.
(3) I wanted to finish rereading before asking questions (rather, I make questions as I reread). I already shared my thoughts on how it's different to play a Kingmaker, or do you mean something else?
What are other people's thoughts on the thing about multiple factions?
As I said, I'm pretty sure we have more than one faction with a chat.
Working on reply to UI (ba-dum-tshhh)
I don't get it.
"Reply" and "U.I." rhyme.
<.<
QUESTION TIME!
SBC: How do you feel about people "ganging up on you because of flavor"? (NOT a direct quote, but what seems to be your text on the matter.) I also know from experience that getting questioned a lot causes you to have less time to scumhunt, which in turn causes more fire to be thrown your way. My question is, how do you plan on getting out of this cycle?
Toaster:
--
I interpret the ruling as alignment is separate from flavor. Abilities may not be so much, but there's no point in chasing that down, since it's essentially rolefishing. Plus, any flavor can be twisted to multiple abilities. For example, let's take the Knight example. That could be a vig (has and uses a sword), a doc (watches over people), a watcher (see above), a reviver (lots of armor), cannot be NKed (*lots* of armor), or several other things.
Basically, you are saying that anyone who looks through flavor a potential rolefisher, correct? Also, these examples are taken from the top of your head, yes?
In this game, flavor is fun and that's it. I hold anyone as suspicious who works with flavor in lieu of scumhunting. People like Caz.
Caz: Can't believe I let this slip earlier:
I'm not going to waste any time trying to decipher whatever it is you're talking about. If there are any obstacles between me and your point, then I'm going to quit trying right there.
Because RP is fun, and trying to figure out people Day 1 is a crapshoot anyway.
That's crap. It's totally possible to find scum D1, and giving up beforehand is at best lazy and at worst scum avoiding work. I want your top two suspects and why.
Although I agree that giving up is not the best idea, how likely do you think it is that we'll actually find scum D1 (instead of, say, a newer player that failed and is feeling overwhelmed)? I'm not saying that SBC shouldn't be under suspicion, but concentrating on him (for example) might be a bad idea. Thus, who is
your second suspect and why?
TiruinPFPI disagree that flavour is separate from mechanics. Our roles were based on the heraldry we submitted, which was all flavor. If mechanics/roles were based on flavor, then can the two really actually be separate?
I thoroughly disagree with this. We're talking about Webadict making the roles.
You know when Webadict makes the roles.
Hilarious stoofs happen.
Meaning: No, really. Flavor =/= mechanics =/= abilities.
I bloody know.
I'm guessing you probably got one in your role?
(Joke question, to make that clear)
PPE: Bah, long post.