Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 157 158 [159] 160 161 ... 234

Author Topic: Space Thread  (Read 367333 times)

Trekkin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2370 on: September 18, 2017, 10:41:28 am »

(silently titters at the highly absurd notion of an interstellar scramjet, that is fusion powered, and uses a huge magnetic ram scoop to suck in interstellar hydrogen for fuel.)

To be fair to Bussard, though, he was working on estimates of interstellar matter density that were orders of magnitude too high. It's not so much "highly absurd" as based on faulty data.
Logged

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2371 on: September 18, 2017, 11:01:41 am »

It's usually referred to as a ramjet. I suspect that if you could get it moving fast enough it would work even with lowered densities, but it needs fuel to get to speed, but it needs speed to get fuel. Paradox!
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2372 on: September 18, 2017, 11:12:56 am »

Solution:

Fire the whole damned ship out of a mass driver-- THEN turn on the engine.
Logged

Trekkin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2373 on: September 18, 2017, 01:41:23 pm »

It's usually referred to as a ramjet. I suspect that if you could get it moving fast enough it would work even with lowered densities, but it needs fuel to get to speed, but it needs speed to get fuel. Paradox!

Not Bussard's original design, no; the drag on the electromagnetic ramscoop far exceeds the thrust that could be generated by fusing together the collected matter regardless of scoop size or speed. Such a ramscoop makes a fine brake, though.

One alternative is to carry fusion fuel onboard and use the ramscoop as a propellant source once the ship is over the critical speed, which significantly reduces the required propellant mass at launch. Using an externally accelerated particle stream to provide the initial acceleration would bring the propellant requirements down to an absolute minimum, particularly if the propellant tanks could be loaded from the stream itself.

Kind of like firing the ship out of a mass driver, just gentler.
Logged

Baffler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Caveat Lector.
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2374 on: September 27, 2017, 07:30:51 pm »

NASA and Roscosmos revealed plans today to cooperate on a jointly operated station in lunar orbit.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/sep/27/russia-and-us-will-cooperate-to-build-moon-first-space-station
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/27/russia-us-agree-cooperate-building-first-lunar-station/

They're in the early stages, just working out common technical standards for parts to be manufactured later, but from the looks of it this is the real deal.
Logged
Quote from: Helgoland
Even if you found a suitable opening, I doubt it would prove all too satisfying. And it might leave some nasty wounds, depending on the moral high ground's geology.
Location subject to periodic change.
Baffler likes silver, walnut trees, the color green, tanzanite, and dogs for their loyalty. When possible he prefers to consume beef, iced tea, and cornbread. He absolutely detests ticks.

sluissa

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2375 on: September 27, 2017, 08:40:55 pm »

Sounds great. US had already planned a token one. Maybe working together we can figure something out thats actually worthy of the attempt.
Logged

WillowLuman

  • Bay Watcher
  • They/Them Life is weird
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2376 on: September 28, 2017, 12:21:30 am »

Can't wait to see it in action! When are the prospective dates?
Logged
Dwarf Souls: Prepare to Mine
Keep Me Safe - A Girl and Her Computer (Illustrated Game)
Darkest Garden - Illustrated game. - What mysteries lie in the abandoned dark?

Trekkin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2377 on: September 28, 2017, 12:28:25 am »

Can't wait to see it in action! When are the prospective dates?

Apparently construction is supposed to start in the mid-2020s. As this is beyond the end of the current presidential administration, expect it to never happen; one of the first things every new President does is tell NASA what their multi-decade-long plan should be. Even if their mandates stayed the same for long enough, they'll never have enough money to do anything manned again after the ISS is shut down.

This is a pipe dream. This is a bunch of political administrators demanding the nerds in their employ do something cool and overruling their objections because who listens to scientists anyway? It will never happen.
Logged

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2378 on: September 28, 2017, 12:55:50 am »

Well yeah, even JFK's moon landing could have occured towards the end of his administration, if he'd survived and run for two full terms (1960-1968).

And Nixon decided to support the Space Shuttle shortly after his inauguration in 1969. While the first orbital tests took as long as 1981, in 1969 it might have appeared plausible that they could have them up and running before the end of Nixon's presumed 2 terms in office.

So ... if you want Trump to authorize something, tell him it'll be up and running by 2024 and it's 100 times as likely to get funded.

martinuzz

  • Bay Watcher
  • High dwarf
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2379 on: October 04, 2017, 10:18:20 am »

Opportunity has now been roving the surface of Mars for 5000 days.
Quite impressive, for a rover that was made to last 90 days.
Logged
Friendly and polite reminder for optimists: Hope is a finite resource

We can ­disagree and still love each other, ­unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist - James Baldwin

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73719.msg1830479#msg1830479

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2380 on: October 04, 2017, 10:22:17 am »

Opportunity has now been roving the surface of Mars for 5000 days.
Quite impressive, for a rover that was made to last 90 days.

Yeah, our technology on Mars continues to surprise us with resilience.
Logged

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2381 on: October 04, 2017, 10:26:11 am »

We built it to last, after all. It had to make 90 days for sure or it was a colossal waste of money.

By the way, it was not a colossal waste of money.



But yeah, score 5000 for modern engineering. We sent a probe to a place no human has ever visited, fully prepared to lose it en route, on landing, and every day of its mission. Now, in one of the harshest imaginable environments, it is still running, at almost 56 times its life expectancy.
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2382 on: October 04, 2017, 10:57:34 am »

All hail Opportunity! (But given how we treated it and Spirit...)
« Last Edit: October 04, 2017, 11:04:21 am by Starver »
Logged

redwallzyl

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Logged

Jopax

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cat on a hat
    • View Profile
Re: Space Thread
« Reply #2384 on: November 07, 2017, 08:25:24 pm »

Logged
"my batteries are low and it's getting dark"
AS - IG
Pages: 1 ... 157 158 [159] 160 161 ... 234