((People keep calling it a vacuum, but it doesn't act much like one. Nor much like a black hole. I'm hunching that Mydidia is some kind of attractive force, perhaps gravity.))
((It seems to work as an extreme lack of matter in a given point (with unnatural matter levels below 0). If it were a black hole, it wouldn't cease to exist, as it should actually grow. The vacuum also explains why it dissapears: because it has been filled.))
((Hence:))
((People keep calling it a vacuum, but it doesn't act much like one. Nor much like a black hole. I'm hunching that Mydidia is some kind of attractive force, perhaps gravity.))
((But a kind of attractive force wouldn't make matter dissapear, and also wouldn't dissapear on its own. That's why I say it's a kind of point with a negative matter))
((As to the first: It could easily crush matter similarly to how black holes do, just to a lesser extent and with a lesser mass, so it doesn't go far enough to make a gravitational singularity. As to the second: Why not?
And if it was negative matter, somehow, how would people made of Myxidia not be destroyed when they "absorb" an amount of matter equal to their mass? And while I'm at it, what happens to the matter? The closest thing to that which exists is antimatter; this and any other method of destroying matter would release energy, and this energy release would be obvious.
Further evidence: It is on the same page as the repulsive force and other words which I could classify as "energies".))
Hah ha, bother me. Who says you're not just giving me ideas?
Are you implying that you don't know what Myxidia is?
((While discussing these things is fun, I sometimes find that as it already is defying the laws of physics this doesn't have much sense, but I will keep on discussing anyway.
Arguments:
1) If it crushes matter, then there would be at least a point of an incredible wheight where the black hole used to be. hat point would inmediately fall and maybe break the floor.
2) Black holes do not dissapear over time. They keep growing as long as there is mass to absorb.
3) People made of black hole-thing has to do an endurance roll upon absorbing stuff, thus absorbing stuff weakens them, unless they roll high enough
4) As it is not "antimatter", but an impossible physically but mathematically feasible "negative matter", that, as negative numbers and positive numbers, negates its opposite.
5) The "classification" argument may be invalid considering how Toaster is not sure of what it is exactly))
((1. The arena was unaffected by any of the massive forces we have brought to bear against it. I can see a speck of neutronium or something smacking into the floor and being ignored.
2. When did I say this was a black hole? I guessed it was a massive, temporary (usually) attractive force.
3. The way I read it, absorbing stuff DISRUPTS them, because it is an uneven force on their body unlike the even force that pulling in air would be. If it was like you've claimed, absorbing stuff would be like more hit points, which would be lost over time as air was absorbed.
4. Physically impossible and extremely nonsensical. Especially since matter with negative mass ("negative energy," it's called) has a
repulsive effect, not an attractive one.
5. It's circumstantial evidence, but it's circumstantial evidence on the same side as many other convincing arguments.))
2) Black holes do not dissapear over time. They keep growing as long as there is mass to absorb.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
((I said "as long as there is mass to absorb". There is plenty of mass in the arena, even in the form of air. So the black hole shouldn't collapse, unless it is not a black hole and it is another phenomenon))
((A wormhole to the land of lost socks is the only logical explanation.))
((If you weren't being satirical, I would disprove that hypothesis heavily.))
Author
Topic: The Pit of Magic: A Perplexicon Game. [Oh well.] (Read 401393 times)