Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[kreepergrimms]

i cant seem to find which building runs the tallow to oil reaction, i have it in my manager but it has not run, i have the tannery and kitchens and every other place i can think of to make oil but its not working

[smakemupagus]

grep or find in file the name of the reaction and you will be able to see its location in the raws, and you will see the building there
(if you had typed it exactly i would have looked it up for you .. )

[Meph]

Chemist. 3 tallow = 1 oil. 

[kreepergrimms]

thanks meph, thats one of the buildings i have yet to test out

[Hefateus]

THIS reaction is one of my favorites. 

[Repseki]

It is quite useful. Yet I still have way more tallow than anyone could ever need.

[Werdna]

I imagine the tallow-surplus that we have now will be greatly reduced in the new version once 'butcher sapients' is disabled.

[Hefateus]

I LIKED the taste of a bit'o' goblin in the stew pot....O well.. Com'er little pekyt, pekyt, pekyt.

[kreepergrimms]

as long as butcher sapients is still an option i am game, i have always played this way, i like the idea that gobbies will be filling my cooking pots, or the occasional elf or human casualty

[Meph]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

[Brilliand]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

Technically it's only cannibalism if they eat their own race. 

[Kazymir]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

Technically it's only cannibalism if they eat their own race. 

Cannibalism in most fantasy settings is defined as eating the flesh of any sapient creature.

[Brilliand]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

Technically it's only cannibalism if they eat their own race. 

Cannibalism in most fantasy settings is defined as eating the flesh of any sapient creature.

So... tigers eating humans is cannibalism, and tigers eating tigers is not?

Do you mean exactly what you said, or would it be more accurate to say that all sapient creatures are lumped together as one race for the purpose of defining cannibalism in fantasy settings?  (not that there is more than one sapient race IRL...)

[Kazymir]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

Technically it's only cannibalism if they eat their own race. 

Cannibalism in most fantasy settings is defined as eating the flesh of any sapient creature.

So... tigers eating humans is cannibalism, and tigers eating tigers is not?
Do you mean exactly what you said, or would it be more accurate to say that all sapient creatures are lumped together as one race for the purpose of defining cannibalism in fantasy settings?  (not that there is more than one sapient race IRL...)

A non-sapient (such as a tiger) cannot make moral choices, while a sapient creature can. A sapient choosing to eat another sapient is committing an act of cannibalism, be it an elf eating a dwarf, or vice-versa.

[kreepergrimms]

Its only one word in the raws, but I did not plan on it being an option. Dwarf = no cannibals. Thats it. This feature should be for the more barbaric races, and elves.

could it be an option? i know its a personal preference but some people would still like the option