There's always the danger of the reverse happening, though. Microsoft may think the model is acceptable, but quit making consoles and games because they're "out of date". Folks who make these kinds of decisions can be very out of touch.
Luckily, everyone's been pretty vocal against a lot of Microsoft's policies. I wouldn't mind them turning around and saying, "Okay, we'll do it your way," and would be quite ecstatic if they did. It'd be a huge victory for consumers, especially since Microsoft is such a big part of the game industry and their decisions could influence how other companies react to similar situations in the future.
And I think it should be clear: I don't think anyone here has a problem with people who want to buy the Xbone, nor do they have a problem with consoles. It's simply a matter of, "These features are anti-consumer", which is perfectly fair. I'd be more than happy to see the Xbone and PS4 succeed, if only because that means competition for the PC market, and competition leads to better prices and products.
I do, however, want them to succeed for the right reasons. There's a real danger where if Microsoft ignores all of the criticism but still manage to have a success with the Xbone that they and other companies will say, "Hey, looks like we can do what we want and get away with it." That's what I'm really afraid of, not forced features or exclusionary DRM.
It's unlikely either way, but it's not a practice I'd want to encourage in the gaming industry.