Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[MrWillsauce]

So what is the current state of the AI law debate?

[scrdest]

I actually think BS12 has events affecting the costs of some items. Mostly the newscaster things, like food riots raising the cost of, well, food. Might be wrong, though.

[Isdar]

I'm the type of person who likes economy simulation games, though, so I could get far too hung up on this.     Fluctuating exchange rates between Supply Points and credits, events triggering/being triggered by purchases and sales (supply shuttle arrivals/departures), etc.  Probably way beyond what most people would want/accept.

I don't think its the players that need convincing. Its the coders.

[USEC_OFFICER]

So what is the current state of the AI law debate?

It exists?

More seriously, what do you mean by AI law debate?

[MrWillsauce]

Like, what are AI laws going to be like after we switch to Baycode? I'm pretty sure they haven't decided on just keeping Baycode laws yet (and I really hope they don't).

[Isdar]

Like, what are AI laws going to be like after we switch to Baycode? I'm pretty sure they haven't decided on just keeping Baycode laws yet (and I really hope they don't).

What's so bad about them?

[MrWillsauce]

I want to be everyone's bitch equally, not the captain's. Also I don't like being able to kill humans in any circumstances (without being subverted of course).

[Iceblaster]

...

I've said I vote Paladin with some modification enough.

I'll just go to my corner and save everyone time.

[MrWillsauce]

PALADIN is a pretty specialized kinda thing, not something that should be default. I do support the AI's ability to choose PALADIN from a selection of lawsets of the beginning of the round though. Also, what about it do you think should be modified?

[Iceblaster]

Eh.

Just mainly some more definites instead of the whole objective definition of somethings, IE, Murder and such are definitely evil, however I agree, relooking over the laws, yet again, I've realized... I probably am terrible at ideas for laws

Ignore me~

[MrWillsauce]

PALADIN's ambiguity is what makes it awesome. It's also what makes it a bad idea for a starting lawset.

[Iceblaster]

Yeah. RP-Wise it's quite entertaining, however I agree, as I said, a bit ambiguous and an AI could use to to screw the crew over at round start because of possibilities when Asimov or otherwise would work better...

[Slayerhero90]

My vote is and will always be for corporate.

[deoloth]

I would like an A.I. law set that used the traditional law set, but held a better regard for positions of rank in terms of orders given to it.

[MrWillsauce]

Most Asimov AIs will respect rank when there's a conflict. The fact that they can ignore rank at their own discretion can be a safeguard against major comdoms.