Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.  (Read 1769 times)

Eric Blank

  • Bay Watcher
  • *Remain calm*
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2010, 01:23:30 am »
I've had considerably worse performance overall. Of course my entire machine is a piece of garbage lumped together for the sake of HAVING a computer, but still, I thought most of the laggier stuff had been changed to reduce it.
Logged
I make Spellcrafts!
Quote from: Andreus on June 09, 2011, 02:07:07 pm
I have no idea where anything is. I have no idea what anything does. This is not merely a madhouse designed by a madman, but a madhouse designed by many madmen, each with an intense hatred for the previous madman's unique flavour of madness.

Scruga

  • Bay Watcher
  • Urist McDwarf cancels eat: Interupted by goat
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #16 on: April 26, 2010, 02:02:16 am »
Quote from: Vercingetorix on April 25, 2010, 08:42:09 pm
I definitely noticed better FPS during rain
That's because your creatures melt, less pathfinding to do :X
Logged
Quote from: Angel Of Death on June 27, 2011, 07:37:04 am
New question! If I were to remove elves [INTELLIGENT] tag in the raws, would it work?
Dwarf Fortress: Where taking a creatures intelligence is an accepted way of modding.

lordnincompoop

  • Bay Watcher
  • Allusionist
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2010, 03:26:32 am »
I got about a 40FPS increase with 0.31.03. That's pretty big.
Logged

Mfbrew

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2010, 07:21:53 am »
I lost about 40 fps when 31 came out, but smaller embarks are more viable now so it evens out.  It'd be interesting to see if there's some common factor among those who lost fps vs those who gained.  Maybe there's some new multi core support Toady hasn't mentioned in detail yet.  I'm running on single core...
Logged

lordnincompoop

  • Bay Watcher
  • Allusionist
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2010, 08:02:59 am »
Well, I have a pretty high-end dual core PC, if that matters any (ATI, too).
Logged

Satarus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #20 on: April 26, 2010, 09:03:14 am »
I've noticed less FPS for the same empark tiles.  A 5x5 emark got my 45 FPS.  I doubt it's the magma pipe I have.  However
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Quote
You need to make said elf leather into the most amazing work of art.  Embed it with every kind of gem you have, stud it with metals, and sew images into it.  Erect a shrine outside your fort with that in the center.  Let the elves know that you view their very skin as naught more but a medium for your dwarves to work on.

LordBucket

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #21 on: April 26, 2010, 12:16:44 pm »
31.x is slower for me that 40d, but not unbearably so. Given the choice of merging the 40d changes first or fixing the bugs first, I'd rather the bugs be fixed first.
Logged

monk12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sorry, I AM a coyote
    • View Profile
Re: Is it just me or is 31.XX alot better than the D## series FPS wise.
« Reply #22 on: April 26, 2010, 12:27:40 pm »
FPS feels a tad slower for me, and I'm playing with smaller embarks than 40d. Then again, I'm playing with twice as many zlvls as well.

The merge should help.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »