Yeah, I remember taking ICT in school. It sounds similar. Except that we learned MS Office AND VB. Ours was a bit more stupid though, because government rules at the time meant that all IT terms would have to be in Malay, not English. Malay is a horribly unwieldy language for technology. Set and reset are translated into "set" and "set semula (again)", both of which are simplified as "set". A lot of other words are just plain awkward, mouse gets literally translated into "tetikus (several mice)", keyboard into "papan kekunci (a board with lots of keys)". It's like inverse Engrish.
Well, the worst thing was the marking system. It had this O, B, A, T system of grading.
O = didn't answer question
B = answered question poorly
A = answered question well
T = answered more than the question asked for
So, if you have a question that says "Name two computer inputs..."
You get O for skipping the question. You get B for answering "Pencil, speaker". You get A for answering "keyboard, mouse". You get a T for "keyboard, mouse, webcam, speaker". Yes, points for completely retarded answers, but the only way to score is to ramble on about stuff even though the question doesn't say so.
OOO = fail, TTT = A, TTA = A-, TAA = B+, AAA = B, and so on. What's stupid was that TTO gives you a C equivalent, and and BBB gives you like a C+. Which means that you could be an expert in the field, but if you miss out on even one blank space, you'll get a C. And someone who knows nothing at all will never fail.
I did the smart thing and dropped the subject. My friend, who's better at computers than me scored a C- in the test. He complained, paid the education ministry for a recheck, and got an A. They claimed it was a technical error, but I'm pretty sure it was stupidity.