The chart still implies a lot about things that otherwise wouldn't be related. Especially that bit at the bottom, why associate the gender of a deity with political-economic systems? What makes ascetic philosophies like Buddhism so anti-egalitarian? And why, in a chart so clearly meant as a pro-matriarchy advertisement, do we see "sex differences minimized" as one of the many pros in opposition to the many cons to the right of this long list of apparent sex differences? That's just hypocritical.
Buddhism doesn't have a god.
The chart contrasts two different types of society. Whether the traits are good or bad is a judgment on your part. In relation to sex diferences, I think the author means differences in opportunity, legal rights, clothing, role in society and so on.
I never implied Buddhism has a deity, your chart implied ascetic philosophies like Buddism are "Patrist" and therefore aligned in the same column as Authoritarianism.
It also aligned "mother goddesses" with all those great things we have in modern democracies, like egalitarianism and freedom of information. What does bringing up the gender of the "parent god/des" have to do with how a society works?