And now, a response to Jim. I would have put this in the previous post, but apparently opinions screw up the lie detector. So says Darvi, at least. As my claim is about to be confirmed (thus showing exactly how wrong Jim is! HA!), I'm going to have a bit of fun with this post.
Jim Groovester: I'm not quite sure what you're asking here. Are you asking me why you shouldn't lynch me for my miller claim, or why you should look at anything but the miller claim, or why you should look at anyone but me? Or are you asking something else?
How about you give me an answer for you being a fakeclaiming Cult Leader instead of beating around the bush by asking exactly what I meant about my question.
I am not a cult leader. I would say more, but I'm still not sure what you tried to ask. Your clarification was utterly useless, seeing how it consisted completely of an attempt to attack me for asking for a clarification. Which, honestly, I can't believe I saw coming from you.
It doesn't matter much. However, at the time, I was interested in hearing a bit more from him about it. I became less interested, so I didn't try to get him to answer the question again after his confused statement. Is there a reason why I shouldn't have asked it, or something?
At the time, what was so interesting about it and what more information did you want to get on the topic?
And that's two questions not answered by Jim in one post! Amazing! Answer my question. Now.
As an answer to your question, I don't remember.
Because Orangebottle's questions were the same basic question, twice, asked while brushing away Webadict's previous answer to said with nothing more than "But a vig probably wouldn't kill the claimed neutralish third party!", a statement which I proceeded to question OB on, whereas Webadict's questions were...well, not that. Webadict had already given his answer to OB's question, and I had no reason to believe it had changed.
Not what Orangebottle asked. He wanted to know why scum Jim Groovester would kill TolyK, because as you might recall, webadict voted me at the end of Day 1 and TolyK was killed during the night. webadict gave a sort of half-answer, and Orangebottle continued to pursue the question.
Really, why do you not care when webadict doesn't answer questions from other about issues that they actually care about, but you do care when I don't answer questions when all they are are rhetorical questions in pursuit of pompous jackassery?
This is the point, in your post, where I finally lost patience with you. Even now,
Jim, you're desperately trying to justify your evasion of a serious question ("Why should I unvote TolyK?"), and now you're even trying to attack outrage at that evasion to bring about a mislynch. Nice fucking job, Jim Groovester. Nice. Fucking. Job.
Why did I not care much about Webadict's failure to reanswer OB? I believe I've given my answer already. But, because you seem to refuse to accept that answer...OB also depended on quite an assumption, and one that certainly appears to be quite false. OB brushed away Webadict's answer/"half-answer" with crap. Webadict's questions (most importantly, his first question) fucking mattered, no matter how much you insist that they were just in pursuit of pompous jackassery. I wanted answers to them, especially the first one. You decided to complain bitterly about the mere idea of answering them. That pissed me off, and it should piss any good player off.
Why do you like WUBA so much this game?
I don't like either of you this game. WUBA somehow sees me as town-like because I joined in on what I saw as a joke during RVS, and thinks that is a brilliant plan. I think that's stupid, and he should feel stupid for it. You, however, have managed to seriously piss me off. And guess what? Your great new theory, that I'm a cult leader because of a miller claim (I still can't believe that's your central reason for thinking I'm a cult leader) is about to be torn apart completely. Your primary lead? Gone. Ha. And, while trying to mislynch me, you managed to attack me for thinking that maybe you should answer an important question from someone you didn't like. I have to wonder why you thought that would be a good idea, Jim. I really have to wonder.
To summarize: Jim's behaviour has failed to impress me.