No ideaa. I sent draignean the next prompt, but he never posted again.
Blargh. I keep meaning to write new comments on your revision before I start a new contest, and then I put that off as well. Blargh.
Short-ish Fiction Contest: Draigcorp 2014 Edition
"Jesus Christ, what's it take to kill this thing?!"
RulesYour story must be greater than 250 words.
Your story must be less than 10,000 words. (Translated into average paperback pages, that's ~40 pages.)
Your story must be submitted before Sunday at whenever-I-start-grading (and preferably earlier) to be considered.
Your story must respond to the prompt (in some way) in order to be considered for grading.
You cannot win twice in a row. You may be ranked first, but you can't get the benefits of 'winning'.
You can submit a story
either in the thread or by pm. If you submit by PM, your story will remain anonymous.
You CanSubmit stories from a larger body of work, as long as they fall within the word limits.
Write in any kind of style you feel like. I really don't give a damn and I've read pretty much anything.
Write poetry. Bear in mind that I am not a brilliant judge of poetry and will be a very wishy-washy critic in that regard.
Note: Poetry is exempt from wordcount.
You CannotWrite stories of graphic sexuality. Forum rules, blah blah blah. Keep Reginald's quivering member to yourself. Sex is fine, just don't make it the centerpiece of the story.
Write nonfiction. I don't care if it's a spectacular history of central Asia that explains Kazakhstan's multi-vector politics AND somehow fits the prompt. NO. Bad brain!
Submit the exact same story twice, even if it fits two prompts. You must evidence clear and substantial revisions before you can re-enter an old piece.
How this Works Every week there will be a prompt submitted. You then have the rest of the week to work on your story. You can submit anytime between the start of the contest and the Sunday the week after the contest begins. The deadline for stories is the end of that sunday. (8-14 day window) If you post after that deadline then I won't consider your story for the rankings and you can use it another time.
That sunday, or in the week following, I will declare someone a winner and rank the rest of the stories. I will provide critique along with each piece. It may not be substantial, but I guarantee you that I will read it and point out the parts of it that I think work best and the parts that need the most work. I will avoid being mean, but I will also avoid telling you something is awesome when I think it needs work.
Then, after I declare a winner, that person declares the next prompt. Then the process repeats. If the winner doesn't post a prompt by the end of Monday, I will post one that night. The winner can also waive the right to make their own prompt, but I can't imagine anyone doing that. I may also veto the winner's prompt and write a new one of the occasion calls for it. Fanfic, since it you need knowledge to write in it, is a banned category for prompts. (Not, however, for stories.)
Prompt 2. Submissions open 3/31 - 4/9
Prompt: Fixing a broken world.
There are no other stipulations or clarifications, so wipe the Cheeto dust from your fingers and get writing.
Q: I've noticed that your critiques have poor grammar, and often use homophones instead of the proper word. Doesn't this make your critique of my grammatically correct paper very silly?
A: Not really. I admit that I tend to run once through my critiques and only give them a scarce pass at editing my language, but the bulk of what I critique will be story and structure. I correct basic grammatical errors, but that's it. I have a lot of critiques to write, and I really don't care overly much as long as I get my point across. I reserve my good English for my own stories.
Q: What qualifies you to judge my magnificent story?
A: Absolutely nothing.
Q: How can I be sure you're an impartial arbitrator who views all stories and genres equally?
A: You can't, I'm not, and I don't.
Q: Is everything going to be done on time every week?
A: No. Probably not.
Q: Will this make me a better writer?
A: Probably, if only because you hammered out a story instead of watching MLP:FiM
Q: Will you be mean? I don't know if I can stand rejection.
A: Hopefully not. I am, however, ill tempered. On another note: grow a spine. As my creative writing professor told me, getting published is about letting fifty random people tell you that you're bad and should feel bad, and then resubmitting to the fifty-first person who actually reads the story. I will not be mean, but you should never let people being mean change how you feel about writing.