> Use spacing.
Paragraphs are there to separate a whole thought train of ideas from the other trains, without using that power, you end up with a mile-long train wreck of words that needs to be sorted over by the authorities and survivors.
This was an allegory, the eyes are the authorities and understanding is the survivor(s).
> I see you made a preamble on your story. That's good for identification if you get lost and I know it is very useful! (I keep on doing this, and not posting it down, heh.) But if you're aiming for a full blown story, or at least part of one that could be picked up, read and then understood: you should learn how to introduce everything from
fluff. This means briefly introducing the setting, time of day if possible, current surroundings and focus of view. More on the focus later.
But what the focus should be on, is primarily the character. The character you're trying to push out and flesh out. Which you did well!
However, while you do use the word 'knight' as the descriptor of your protagonist, I think you should describe how he does look to others. I can think of a thousand knights, all with the name Gerald, but I'm not sure how exactly he looks like. He could be a muscular, trained Hedge-Knight, or a bit stout on the side from the peace.
Or he could be like a certain black-armored knight with a broken nose and a snarky attitude...You did not specify the color of armor, and while the normal steel/iron colored plate comes to mind, I can imagine him in pink and there would be no harm done there or would thinking him as bald and frail. Or if he was in plain clothes or just a surcoat and chainmail. Requesting for more detail, but you did well there.
> On the focus: it is the most important tool you use in crafting a story. It is how you bring the reader's vision to play. How an observer shall see it with their mind's eye. From where I see it, you're doing it from third-person, limited. Good work there! But you need to do more, continuing below.
> Detail, detail, detail.
And, detail.
"...as usual...the day was quite dull"
Aye, the day is dull. But what makes it dull? No, rephrase. What makes it dull from your
character's eyes? You, as a narrator, have no power or influence in how the story is played.
Just a voice.So, Sir Gerald, what makes this day dull for you?
> Knights, in history, obey a certain code that distinguishes them from the commoners and soldiers of their era and time. That is the Code of Chivalry. No knight shall lay harm to any innocent or woman. "Bashing someone's brains out" does not sound good, but it does lead to the imagery of an uncaring mercenary, which I guess is what you're trying to put your character out as. And one with respect of nobility, too!
Though, you did repeat "Gerald was a former Hedge-knight" following "Gerald was a knight". Redundancy there.
Plus, the term of 'knights' were used in Medieval Europe. I had a hard time distinguishing them in America
, don't take this sentence as criticism, just my personal note.
> It may be my inexperience with English wordplay, but I'm not sure if "as per usual the day" would be correct. Semantically, I don't think so, but it may just be how I read. And you misused the comma right after "Gerald" in the first sentence.
'Gerald, looked about him, as per usual the day was quite dull, this was-after all-the first time the council had convened in months, and as expected the usual rivals shouted each other down from across the chamber and the other representatives argued over some fool thing or other.'
"Gerald looked about him, observing the men and women sitting in the stands which towered above him, and turned his head back to staring at the marble floor. It was a dull day once more, the usual arguments were thrown during the session as political rivals played their word-games; as tension rose, so did their voices, leading to nothing more but shouting and noise. The occasional deflection onto a random fool was placed in here and there, but there was nothing new to be gained from all this."> The " , and as expected..." part sounds like a whole new sentence and thus, a whole new idea. Separate it with a period instead of a comma, unless that is what you refer to by "the day was quite dull".
> In my opinion, the use of the dash was misused there. "This was-after all-the first..."
Commas could be put to better use, and there needs to be spaces before the first and after the last dash.
> I edited a bit, in italics. Hope it helps.
> "Since the Duke had spread himself so very thinly trying to quell any unrest..."
Ouch, that must really hurt.
So I guess you were referring to the Duke's armies or his Military strength and not his personal and physical body, right?
> If the Count and Sir Gerald were friends for some time, go and
show it. A tiny gesture, a nod of the head, a meeting of eyes and a curt signal would all do. Mostly, you can't just say they are friends and leave it like that.
I can say I'm friends with the current reigning dictator of [insert town here], but that would just be what I say. How do I show it?
> Well, the above is what I would have said, if I hadn't missed the "Count Amerisk who gave him a knowing wink from the upper balcony."
Great.
Though, saying it by the word 'wink' would be strange to some. Detail, please.
Overall, the start is well-off, needs a bit of polishing in detail and who is going to be who. You have a nice set of potential protagonists, an unknown antagonist and an ally to the knight.
Very interesting.