Yeah, I pretty much think so.
(In reply to the subject.)
Then we'll see minor version releases incrementing fairly rapidly, as some... unintended and undocumented feature gets revealed in 0.??.01 by the ravenous playing hordes and sends Toady back to the code to make 0.??.02 to 'modify' said behaviour more to his original intentions. Rinse, repeat. You all that are complaining that there's not been a new version out for ages will be end up complaining that you can't get stuck into any version because another one is bound to come out 12-24 hours later, and that you can't wait for version 1.0.0 to come out... (Personally, I think 1.0.15 is going to be about right, by arbitrarily extrapolating from the relevant historic forerunner cases.)
Basically, as it was before, as it will be again. And that's not counting the cries of "I can't get the <newfeature> to work properly!", even though it does essentially do so but there's some doubt over the interface to poke and prod it with. And I see nothing wrong with the basic on/off/modify/improve flow that I postulate, before you ask. What we have is a Creator who is balancing (more or less correctly, though there are people who would argue the balance is tipped wrong in either/both directions) the almost mutually-exclusive design paradigms of perfectionism and continual development.