What do you think of that, Ottofar? Lurkers and "not really playing the game at all"ers are bad for the game, right? Should we be going after lurkers to make sure they don't slip under the radar and ruin the game?
With lack of better targets yes.
Excellent.
Then I'm gonna suggest to everyone that we lynch you right now unless you start actually playing. We can't read people if they only make occasional fluff posts. I want a message sent to scum that if they want to win they have to at least come out into the open and let us try to read them.
Normally I would be all for it, but right now I have a role I'd like to keep until at least tomorrow, preferably a day further.
But if you must, then you must.
Ottofar: What's your opinion on the current argument between PM and GlyphGryph?
Why aren't you doing anything?
As I see it, GG shortened because he said he'd do it, in GTDaL-thread. I didn't like PM's reaction, since the shorten really had no chance to go through. I find this a tell similar to a thing I do on IRC: in 3p situations, someone fakevotes and I immediately state clear, as if I hadn't noticed the fakeness.
It's a rather small tell though. Glyphgryph did go pretty aggressive over it, and I can't really recall the meta for him.
I think PM is town. Not too sure about GG.
Also busy.
Ottofar: Are you lurking? I've only seen one post of yours, as an answer to Leafsnail's vote on you. What can you make of all this?
Not intentionally, gonna have to apologize for that. I've been slightly busy for about a week, and I usually post too little. Gonna try and change it now. I don't make much yet, I'll be back soon.