Again, we're not debating that it is true that the Senate hasn't passed a budget for three years. We're saying that your conclusion that "Senate can't pass a budget" equates to "Obama is a hardliner and completely unwilling to compromise" is idiotic. I'm honestly not sure if you're ignoring that or what.
If you look at my first post earlier tonight, my point, before responding to insults, was that if Obama wins, he will be inheriting a real mess, but this time he won't be able to complain he inherited the mess from the previous president since he will be the previous president. It was a disgrace to the office of the presidency that he blamed Bush and Republicans over and over and over again despite the fact that he inherited the mess from a democratically-controlled House and a democratically-controller Senate of which he was a member. He could have said as a senator "Wait, if we pass these budgets, the next president will inherit budget deficits." But he voted for the budgets those two years, became president, and then claimed he inherited budget deficits. From whom? Pelosi? Reid? Senator Barrack Obama?
As a senator, I doubt Obama voted against a single bill that Bush signed. I admit, I don't know if this is true, but for Senator Obama to have voted against a bill that Bush signed, House Majority Leader Pelosi would have had to let the bill get through the House that she controlled, Senate Leader Reid would have had to let it get through the Senate that he controlled, and Obama would have had to go against the wishes of the two Democratic party leaders, Pelosi and Reid. So, if Bush signed any bad bills that left the next president in a mess, Obama most likely did not vote against those bills. (I'm being careful not to say he voted for them because he is known for rarely actually voting -- he spent most of his time as senator running for thr presidency).
Now, if he wins, he can't blame the Senate because the Senate has been controlled by democrats for the last six years. He can, and probably will, blame the House, but the dems have controlled the House for four of the last six years. My point is he will find someone to blame. It is in his nature.
Re-electing Obama as president is like the captain of the Titanic purposely backing up after hitting the iceburg to hit it again. Once is more than enough.
As far as getting into a debate on which side is less willing to compromise, I don't see the point. You believe what you believe, and I believe what I believe, and neither of us can prove we are right and the other wrong.