Hey, doesn't matter if American is doing the Obama Apology World Tour, they will still go to war. Look at what happened in Libya.
Yes, please, tell me - how many soldiers did we lose in Obama's war compared to Bush's war? How long did it take us to win Obama's war compared to Bush's war? How much did we spend? The people asked us to be there, begged us to come, and we earned goodwill from the citizens of the country rather than their hatred. And, to top it all off, we didn't START this war - we joined it midway through due to treaty obligations we are expected to fulfil, and which congress, in fact, approved.
Congress did not give Obama the approval to goto war. Even using his presidental authority to goto war without congressional approval for 90 days, he did not get approval for going to war period.
Blame and hate Bush all you want, but at the very least he went and got approval from congress.
Libya did far more good for us and accomplished quite a bit more for quite a bit less than the mess we got into in Iraq.
How so? Oh, right.. because the coalitian against Libya wanted to oust a dictator who happened to have control over some very profitable oil fields and he just happened to be obstinate enough to finally get ousted?
I could see someone who was opposed to the Iraq war making a good case against Libya, and I'd have no problem with them. But the SOLE argument people use is "see - Obama does it to!", and that's a bullshit argument hands down.
I would have no problem with the war if he had at least gotten the approval of the senate, and conducted it through the law. He did not.
Ontop of that, the whole circumstances and reasons for invading Libya are more controversial than what happened in Iraq.
If you argue Libya was for humanitarian purposes, then you give an automatic pass to Iraq because, well, Saddam Hussein did gas his own people (the kurds, ya know? roughly 100,000 of them).
Oil? There's Oil in Libya too!
Taking down an oppressive regime? Thats what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan!