In regards to 002: I agree about it, but it can easily, or quickly, get shot down by the Supreme Court; like with the example that "corporations = people" earlier.
If anything, we can at least curb their spending and influence it big time by providing a maximum limit to how much they can be allowed to "influence" politics with their spending, and how much of it has to come straight out of their pockets, rather than the companies they own, and any cash leftover is not returned to them, but instead put into federal taxes to fund everything else necessary to keep this country running.
Make them a little more responsible with the money they so frivolously spend to get someone into office (or control the New World Order). They win, they get a new jackass into office to attempt to shut this down (guarded by Supreme Court if they support it), they lose, our country runs for another term. And just to make sure they can't cop out of helping the people out, they will have a required minimum investment they must provide for basic funding campaigns. Either way, they're paying their part. They don't want to support someone, too bad, that money (at least at minimal value) is still being put into taxes, and used for a greater good; but if you're going to support another jackass that'll run this country into the ground, then what remains (which should be pretty much close to equal minimal at least, unless they know how to spend every last cent) will still provide buffer.
Re-reading all that, I'm not certain all the mechanics of it, but what I intend to have done is either discourage their spending, or at least put their frivolty to good use, whether they like it or not. Take advantage of them at a federal level, legally, for once. There has to be a way something like this can be done. A cancel-out can be canceled out, but re-routing the flow of things can be more possible. It's easier to make an adjustment like that, rather than put it to a full stop.
I'd like to think of it as thinking ethically equivalent to them, and using that against them, or playing their game in return, with at least some understanding of how they play it. They cheat, we take advantage of it