Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jack A T]

Okay, I've thought about this situation a good bit, and I've decided to vote McArathos.

The exaggeration I brought up is his biggest point against Imiknorris, which I do not see as a good sign.  I want to see him respond soon.

[Darvi]

Votecount:
 

Urist Imiknorris	- 1 -  NativeForeigner
Think0028	- 0 -
Powder Miner	- 0 -
NativeForeigner	- 1 -  Urit Imiknorris
Vector	- 0 -
Toaster	- 0 -
Jack AT	- 0 -
Urist_McArathos	- 2 -  Toaster, Jack A T
-
Not Voting	- 4 - Vector, Powder Miner, Urist_McArathos, Think0228
No Lynch	- 0 -
-
Extend	- 2 -  Toaster, Urist I - One more vote for extension
Shorten	- 0 -

The day may or may not end in ~5 hours. Seriously I have no fucking clue anymore.

[Urist Imiknorris]

Okay, I've thought about this situation a good bit, and I've decided to vote McArathos.

The exaggeration I brought up is his biggest point against Imiknorris, which I do not see as a good sign.  I want to see him respond soon.

This seems like rather flimsy reasoning. If you really want him to respond, why didn't you extend?

[Urist_McArathos]

Imiknorris: refuge in audacity is a scumtell.  It's the equivalent of opposing an argument by saying it in a silly voice, as though by making it sound absurd it becomes absurd.  It is a logical fallacy, and was a big red flag to me.

Toaster: I'm strongly in favor of flavor hunting, but you'll note my case against Imiknorris is almost entirely based on traditional hunting.  Claiming I said we should never do it, or that I'm not, is untrue and twisting my words.

Jack/Others: I took Imiknorris statement as an argument favoring traditional hunting and tells over flavor hunting.  I'm going to lynch the person with scummier flavor, because that's something they can't explain away as easily, and is very reliable.  I believe trying to downplay the importance of flavor tells is the policy of someone who has something to hide.

[Darvi]

A quarter hour left. I think.

[Urist_McArathos]

Extend, Imiknorris to prevent a mislynch.  I've answered Jack, so no reason to keep that "pressure vote on.  Will full claim after work, if people still suspect me.

[Darvi]

Thanks for postponing my having to write flavour for another 24 hours.

[Urist_McArathos]

Unvote in the meanwhile.  MOD: will the day end on Saturday or Monday, for clarification?  Still posting from work.

[Darvi]

Friday.

[Urist_McArathos]

Ugh, I work too much...I forgot what day it was.

[Darvi]

Tell me about it.

[Darvi]

Think has 10 minutes or he'll be prodded.

[Think0028]

Writing post now!

[Darvi]

That was fast.

[Toaster]

Both Urists:  Where did Urist McA say it?  Right here.

Oh, right.  You start off the day with a blatant OMGUS.  Later you state that you're looking for scummy actions instead of flavor in a flavor heavy game.  So far, this is the battle cry of the scum player, since they know they can't explain away scummy flavor.  Slips can be argued, mislynches justified, and mistakes waved away, but if your flavor stinks in this kind of game you can't hide it.

I greened the most important bit.  No, it doesn't directly say traditional scum hunting is bad, but it lumps doing so in with scum behavior.  That's close enough for me.


McA:  I am in fact stating that you're doing little traditional scum hunting, and that's why you've ended two out of three days with no votes.  You do that because, as scum, you're having trouble coming up with arguments on people.

And I still want your flavor-based conclusion.  Come on, where is it?


Jack A T:  You voting Urist McA so soon after I did distresses me a bit.


Darvi:  Can we get a precise time of day day ends?