Extend
Imiknorris:
So you say. I don't believe that, you would have pointed it out immediately if you had read it as a contradiction the first time.
I reached that conclusion because you said those exact words, duh. Also, that's not Toaster giving someone crap. That's Toaster pointing out that it's not as as much of a stretch to reach your conclusion as I first thought it was.
Reread and realized that I thought you were referring to something totally different, so ignore statements about pointing out your innocence. As for lying about the context, that's not really something you can lie about. The context was not as clear as I thought it was and you're trying to take advantage of that now.
I was even busier than WWM (with finals and all) and no one really called me out on that. Also, I didn't really have to try until now. In WWM, it wasn't as easy to be lazy. Regardless, that still doesn't explain why you're using recent-game meta instead of established meta.
What argument? You can't call your failure to question me earlier and your failure to ask for clearer context an argument.
I'm trying to tell you to save face because you're making a fool of yourself and tunneling (I'm admittedly starting to tunnel at this point as well). Things go poorly when players start to tunnel, that's why I'm telling you to save face and look for a better case, because even if you are an elf, you might be able to actually find a witch before you get lynched. Gotta remember that there are at least two anti-town parties and elf (definitely elf) or town, witches are still an enemy.
Riiiiiight, so after I started attacking you and you found something to take the pressure off yourself you jumped back in. That's not so far off from what I said.
Only wine can come from this question, so I'm not very surprised that you would ask it. I'll answer it anyway: No, it doesn't extend to that because as scum, my goals don't change. However, when I start as a townie and I'm converted into a cult (thus changing my goal) I feel that I've failed my original goal and lose a little bit will to play, which negatively impacts my effort. So that's one wine-filled question and it could also be seen as a trap (I answer yes, you have me because I haven't been trying hard, I answer no and don't back it up and you can claim I'm lying). What is it with you and traps? Or maybe I'm just reading too much into your questions.
The difference between today that made me need to try is that you're actually making an effort to defend yourself, making me have to defend myself, people aren't already at your throat, and you don't have flavor that makes you obvelf (because you're probably a convert). Jim had incriminating flavor, Dariush has always been rather poor at defending himself (he rages too much) and people were already after him.
It must be unbelievably humiliating to your inner-dwarf to have been converted by elves in the first place!
Jack: A sudden dip in effort after N1 followed by a sudden jump in effort in D4 after I started attacking him, his refusal to see my statement in the context I intended, his lack of an actual case against me, tunneling (of which I am also guilty), OMGUS, and his failure to even suspect someone who's flipped elf. I think that's it.
Think/McArathos: Totally missed that, my bad. I don't think I said I thought you were a convert. Don't think I actually said I thought you were anti-town, either. I simply said I was going to give you a look-over because several people seem to think you might be scum. Not throwing any accusations your way yet.
McArathos: Where did I even mention that I was snatching up Dariush's message for anything? I thought Imiknorris was probably an elf since D2. The cult-context came after some analyzing. Dariush was only mentioned when I mentioned that he also thought that elves were a cult.