PS how do i hide image under "Spoiler"?
Instead of just "[ IMG ]the image[ /IMG ]", use "[ SPOILER ][ IMG ]the image[ /IMG ][ /SPOILER ]". (Without the spaces in the tags, obviously, and not case-sensitive but here in UPPER mostly for illustrative purposes, but also because that's my personal default when hand-typing them.) If you created the [ IMG ] tag pair with the appropriate reply button and want to do the same with the [ SPOILER ], then highlight the entire [ IMG ] bit and then click on the "radiation symbol" button in the standard menu (third group to the right of the one with the IMG in, and last of those four... i.e. 13th button along, just before the Unordered List/Bulletpoints button. YMMV.).
It comes out thusly:
If you want to give it some more explanatory text, manually put "=Explanatory text" after the "[SPOILER" and its "]"
Thusly:
HTH, HAND.
BTW, "Alt-PrtScr" takes a shot of just the currently active window, so you needn't have edited down the full-screen shot that I think you did with just PrtScr, leaving as you did just a hint of the Firefox window behind it and even some partial hints of some of the desktop icons through its transparency. Just another tip, there. (Not sure what Vista/7 does with the bits around those rounded corners that I find annoyingly "modern"[1], when window-grabbing Or indeed what happens to that pseudo-transparent border. Probably treats all the background as black, or another default background colour. Not that it matters.)
However, regarding the temple, I would make
my temple single-rock-typed (at least per layer), even if it meant mining out all 'unwanted' walls before inserting desired stone (in the form of blocks). And because that might look messy because of unevenly revealed "one layer in" bare rock, I would probably either set corridors behind the walls to obliterate such raggedness, or dig out a layer
regardless before replace it all with said walls. (Floors, of course, would also be laid, but don't need removal of rock below to accomplish.) As I don't Engrave, I completely forget whether this prevents such.
[1] I still don't like the "Fisher-Price" look to the XP Start button, pseudo-roundness through shading and borders. I often use it, rather than reverting to the "Classic" 2K/NT/9x-ish look but give me some honest squared-off grey buttons with a couple of pixels border that indicates relief. Sorry. Beware an Old Fogey barging through this thread. Give way to your elders and betters! You young people!! "Wouldn't know a hard days coding if it came up and bit you on the leg. Why, in my day..." Yadayadayada...