Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Is this considered cheating?

Yes
- 12 (18.2%)
No
- 36 (54.5%)
Sort of
- 18 (27.3%)

Total Members Voted: 66


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Is it considered cheating?  (Read 5573 times)

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #45 on: November 11, 2011, 07:30:04 am »
Quote from: King DZA on November 10, 2011, 01:57:13 pm
going back in time to fix something that goes wrong is not an intended feature.
Tell that to Sam Beckett!

Oh boy!
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #46 on: November 11, 2011, 07:40:57 am »
Quote from: King DZA on November 10, 2011, 02:22:00 pm
I was just clarifying that it is, in fact, very much possible to cheat at Legos.

Interesting, if not particularly germane to this discussion, that I call it Maths, where others call it Math, but others call them Legos where I call them Lego.

(My logic can be expressed roughly following the pattern of Lego bricks => A whole lot of Lego, just like, grammatically, sand grains => a whole lot of sand.  It just sounds right to me.  And Math is short for Mathematics, much as "methodologies" can be called "methods". Which is not to say that I don't know justifications for the alternate variants.  So do ignore this derail, you're probably right as well, or get an equal headache from hearing/reading my versions. :) )
Logged

proxn_punkd

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still a better dove story than Twilight
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2011, 12:58:54 pm »
Quote from: Starver on November 11, 2011, 07:30:04 am
Quote from: King DZA on November 10, 2011, 01:57:13 pm
going back in time to fix something that goes wrong is not an intended feature.
Tell that to Sam Beckett!

Oh boy!

Tell it to Link in Majora's Mask.

Then brace yourself for the tantrum spiral to end all tantrum spirals.
Logged

Garath

  • Bay Watcher
  • Helping to deforest the world
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2011, 02:02:36 pm »
in that, fortune telling by itself is meddling with the future since now people could do what is not expected
Logged
Quote from: Urist Imiknorris
Jam a door with its corpse and let all the goblins in. Hey, nobody said it had to be a weapon against your enemies.
Quote from: Frogwarrior
And then everyone melted.

ZeroSumHappiness

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2011, 05:06:23 pm »
Unless, of course, it's self-stable or a predestination paradox.
Logged

Necro910

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary Drunk +5
    • View Profile
Re: Is it considered cheating?
« Reply #50 on: November 11, 2011, 05:37:19 pm »
Quote from: Garath on November 11, 2011, 02:02:36 pm
in that, fortune telling by itself is meddling with the future since now people could do what is not expected
"You will kill your son"
"That's easy, I just won't do it!"

*twenty years later*
"OH GOD I JUST RAN MY SON OVER" :P

It really depends what it is. The only true way to avoid the future is death.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
« previous next »