What, to you people, is freedom?
I will attempt to answer the question. Difficulty arises in that "freedom" is a concept that only makes sense within a context that allows for the possibility of restriction. We, as human beings, do appear to exist within such a context, so it "makes sense" here, but how does one describe
Loosely speaking, freedom is the circumstance in which consciousness is able to experience in accordance with its choosing. This fails as a definition, because capacity to be aware of "options" might also be constrained. For example, it's difficult for a mouse to choose to get on a space shuttle and fly to the moon because it doesn't know about space shuttles or the moon. How can the mouse make such a choice? This lack of awareness itself can be viewed as a limitation of freedom.
Following that concept to its conclusion, "absolute freedom" might be described as a state of absolute knowing. A state in which consciousness is aware of all possibility. However, in such a state, it's likely that there would be no choosing, because again...all possibility is known. One does not need to look through a window to see whether it's clear or cloudy outside when one already knows. If one could simultaneously perceive two universes, one of which with clear and one with cloudy skies, would there not be even less reason to look out a window? When one knows
everything and can perceive
all possibility, what choices are there to be made?
In such a state, the question of "freedom" is somewhat beside the point. And, presumably, ironically, the only way to "act" upon "choice" would be to limit ones awareness of the All in order to focus on discrete possibliities...to
choose amongst infinity to observe the finite, by blocking awareness of the possibilities not selected for viewing.
It is via this process that we experience the context in which a question like "what is freedom?" makes sense.