I'm back after a day full of girls. Miss me?
Since I know that I'm town, I assume that Andrew actually is the cop, since if he were fakeclaiming he could just as easily clear his own partner. So it's down to the "Sh" players. Since there are two scum among you three, making a forced mislynch a possibility, I was going to make a bold suggestion: that you three "circle vote" each other (Shake votes Shoes, who votes Shark, who votes Shake, for example), leaving the game deciding votes to the confirmed town, Andrew and myself, and then we would wait to see who slipped up. Since this is a tactic I've never seen used before, I had no idea how well it work, and so I was reluctant to suggestst it. However, since I see the last post is Shoes voting me, who's been found innocent by the cop, for no real good reasons, my scumometer has been set off. Let's dissect his post.
Well, this seems as good a time as any to post my opinions. At this point, I'm sure you guys don't think I have any.
Well, we got scummy from the first words. Without a word of explanation he launches into what is, if I recall correctly, his first scum hunting post of the day. His previous two were questioning why anyone would do something as crazy as
reveal their role, suggesting he hadn't bothered to read the posts before him, in which the reasons for doing so are laid out. Also, we got this delightful quote: "Why would I try to prove my innocence? Scumhunting in it and of itself is partly essential to proving your innocence.". Well... we can see he's not been defending himself, but I don't see any scumhunting either, so I guess he can be considered doubly suspicious. Also, I know my record of tying timing to scumminess isn't great, but seriously man, you couldn't have picked a worse time to get back into the game then immediately after someone gives you the finger. Moving on...
Shakerag: Besides his other reasons for voting for me, lynching lurkers is generally a bad idea. It just reduces your own numbers and gets the scum to victory quicker.
You know, every other thing you say convinces me more that you're not paying attention to this game. Did you forget it's lylo? Lurking just says "I'm too scared of revealing myself when we're this close to winning, so I'll say nothing and hope the vote goes another way". And "reducing our numbers", "getting the scum closer to victory"? Again, LYLO. If you're not going to help the town, you're directly helping the scum, Shoes.
Remalle: When you asked Andrew about his copping-police-po-po strategy, that seemed like you were trying to avoid getting investigated. Otherwise, for the most part, you're still posting RVS questions. You seem to be rather casual about it, too, as if you know for a fact that other people are townies.
K, first, have you even read anything at all all game? Andrew investigated me on N2.
I wanted to know his copping strategy to help confirm his claim. Since then I've decided to believe him, for the reasons at the top of this post.
I'm asking RVS questions because I'm trying to get a better read on you, Shark, and Shake. My two previous suspects, Caz and Andrew, both turned out to be town, leaving you three, who I didn't do much searching against before.
And... casual? Is that actually enough to throw a vote at
me, when you had just as much real evidence as against Shark, of whom you said (and I quote) "Not enough suspicions from me to vote for him, though".
I hope anyone doesn't think of this as an OMGUS, because I think he has been playing scummy enough to justify a vote even if he hadn't voted me.
ShoesandHats, you're either obvious scum, or the worst town I've ever seen.