But Indie games are as a whole like that. They all just take superficial elements like "Classic platformer" or "survivor horror" or "Roguelike" and treat those features like they are fun in it of themselves instead of trying to make them as fun as they can possibly be.
Whenever I see a indie classic platformer and I hear the excuses in my ear "But it is so classic" I instantly compare it to Super Mario where the entire game was expertly crafted to be as fun as possible with the little resources as they have. While they intentionally use less resources but instead of using that as a way to put in more polished gameplay they treat "we have less" as a feature.
---
I do think I should hold off on playing your game URR xD
Because I think we both know I'd never give the game any mercy.
This, sadly, is very true: using a definition doesn't immediately make a game! Pah. But then, it's much harder to make an actual game than to just copy a mechanic you saw somewhere and call it a game; honestly (and maybe this is an unpopular opinion) I think the massive expansion in the last ~10 years of the ability to make and distribute games hasn't been entirely positive. In pricinple a lowering of the barriers to entry to game design SHOULD be a good thing... and yet it has allowed so much nonsense to saturate the market and get in the way. Eh. It's probably good overall, but there have been major downsides.
THIS WEEK'S UPDATE:This week I haven’t been able to get any coding done, and the same will sadly be the case for the next seven days – I’ve been finishing off an academic book chapter due in very shortly, as well as doing some writing for various online game publications (links will be posted here once my pieces are published), and also writing three different conference presentations for three talks I’m giving at DiGRA in Lüneburg next week (so once I upload that, and my previous set of talks, I’ll be uploading six sets of slides for your perusal! I’ll get around to it folks, I promise). So, this week and next week we’re going to talk about some of the more abstract intentions/plans for 0.8 onwards, then hopefully after that we’ll be back to specific updates once I get working on 0.8 again upon returning from Germany (week of the 18th onwards). Two big abstract/worldbuildy changes in this release alongside the development of NPCs (!!) are policies, and nicknames, so let’s talk about these.
PoliciesDuring the development of 0.7, I found myself making a major change to how national policies work. Originally the idea was for them to give abstract benefits to the player – one policy might yield a player who belongs to that nation extra strength, for example – but I found this increasingly uninteresting. So much of the game’s mechanics are meant to be about figuring out and understanding the generated world, and I realized it would be a lot more interesting if policies directly affected what spawned in each nation – so the macro of a nation’s political ideologies and policies then determine what buildings appear (or not) in cities, towns, within buildings, etc.
So, a pretty simple key. Green effects are policies which don’t relate to shops; yellow policies relate to types of shops which can spawn in that nation; which the red ?s, funnily enough, are policies I haven’t thought of a good effect for (any ideas?). Escort Cavalry is a nomadic-only policy, and Chiefdom is a hunter-gatherer only policy, but aside from those, any of these policies can spawn for any feudal nation (Monastic is in red because it is a new policy I haven’t yet added to the game or created an image for). At the bottom you’ll see two binary possibilities: from 0.8 onwards, nations will either be slaving nations or won’t be, and nations will either use gunpowder weapons, or won’t.
With this system policies will therefore seriously affect (I hope) a player’s path around the world and choosing which nations to visit, knowing that certain shops will only appear in certain nations, some will be more/less hostile to foreigners, some have different systems for payment (or not) when moving around cities, some nations will have different punishments if the player decides to commit a crime within their land, etc. Should add an interesting level of grand strategy to the player’s movement, and be a lot more interesting than “abstract policies” which affect the player, but fail to distinguish between nations.
City NicknamesCredit for this idea must go to Retropunch. He suggested that I could add some distinguishing factors to cities which both make them stand out more from each other, and add the potential for nicknames. In this release I’m aiming to add this in over a dozen ways to make cities more distinct, and add in another “clue” – i.e. the nickname – by which cities might be identified. This means the generation algorithm for a small number of cities will be tweaked to ensure that something very noteworthy spawns in/around/throughout a given city, and then an appropriate nickname is generated. Some examples:
City with many slums: “City of the Downtrodden”, “The Evergrowing City”, etc
City with many gardens: “The Flowering City”, “The City of the Hundred Gardens”, etc
City near volcano: “The City of the Inferno”, “The City of the Red Mount”, etc
Slaving city: “The City of the Masters”, “The City of Shackles”, etc
City with many statues: “The City of Stone Watchers”, “The City of the Grey Men”, etc
And so on. I’ve got around fifteen ideas so far for feature/nickname combinations (you’ll be able to find the rest in 0.8!), so maybe five cities per playthrough will be granted some unique “overlay” (like lots of gardens, lots of statues, etc) and a nickname to go with it. So then the player will sometimes be told
“Travel to [ City Name ]”, but will instead sometimes be told
“Travel to [ City Nickname ]” – a small thing in gameplay terms, but something which’ll add some nice extra variety to the world’s cities and help the player remember which city is which. The idea of the nickname in general seems like something very promising, so I’ve also been working on adding nicknames to other things in the game, primarily rulers and important historical figures, and also noteworthy living figures the player will be engaging with, and it’s those I’ll be talking about next week!
Author
Topic: Dwarf Fortress meets The Outer Wilds? "Ultima Ratio Regum", v0.10.1 out Feb 2023 (Read 636073 times)