Jack:Switching doctor with just a general "valuable role", I see. Nice. The thing about a doctor is that it's an NK magnet, and it generally can't defend itself. Compare that to other valuable roles which are also NK magnets, but are more likely to be protected. Again, I see no contradiction between "We shouldn't lynch someone who claims a valuable role" and "WHY. WOULD. YOU. ROLECLAIM. DOCTOR."
Admittedly, as if doctor isn't a valuable role I'm not sure what is. "Anything but a doctor, because then a doctor might protect them" sounds like a rather strange answer, especially if we're
only talking about D1.
Taking into account that he was calling for a completely random lynch in that post, and calling for lynching people regardless of their defenses, I think I can safely say that he wasn't talking about towntells.
So the purpose of his plan
was to weed out boring roles. I mean, if you don't care at all whether someone's town or scum, but still won't lynch certain people based on their roles, I'm not sure what else you could conclude.
Your elaboration accusation: I like taking context into account when looking at what people say. It's generally a good idea, and allows me to get reads more easily. Also, I'm not going into anything beyond the glaringly obvious.
So you consider doctor being a useless role and Nuke making sense and being nonmalicious to all be "glaringly obvious." I'd really like to hear about those last two.
...I can't believe you actually said this.
Everybody: IronyOwl has just announced that he avoided voting for, or even FoSing, a player he explicitly considers very scummy just to avoid looking like he's OMGUSing.
Correct. Pressure doesn't accomplish anything if the target can convince themselves it isn't valid.
Unvote, vote IronyOwl. You obviously care more about your own image than catching scum.
Wait, what? What happened to quicklynching MBP? You don't like that plan anymore?
MBP:Feels like a bit of bandwagoning...Check out the underlined
''Oh, i don't want to move my vote, hes the most likely to be lynched, so by voting him i can show i'm a good townie. That's what good townie do right? Right ? ''
That's more along the lines of "I don't have anyone I need to pressure with it, nor are there enough votes on him that I can remove mine without worry."
Hmm, answering a question with another is poor form. Care to answer mine ?
...
That was an answer. That question was rhetorical, though looking back at it I suppose wasn't precisely what you asked. For your exact question, yes, I suppose I'd kill someone non-confirmed in my place.
Of course, the
relevant answer is a lot different, since the above one assumes my impending doom is some unfortunate event that just
happened. The
real question would be more like "If you had fucked up so repeatedly and grievously that you were
convinced you'd be lynched for your scummy bullshit, would you take the noose like a man or give the scum a free NK in order to kill your primary attacker, hoping that this would somehow make you
less scummy than anything else you could have done?" To which my answer would be "Fuck no, I would take the noose like a man and hope the rest of the town aren't complete fuckups like I was."
Now to answer your questions.
Revise your Maths, if i let myself be lynched, mafia still get their kill, 0 % of scum death, while I had 1 in 3 of getting scum. Missed, but was worth the shot. Including today's lynch is a cool little way to load the question.
You, Leafsnail, NK target. Three townies down the drain.
If your lynch was a guarantee, I don't see why it'd be any
less so after killing the confirmed townie who was going after you. Leafsnail I shouldn't have to explain, not that I should have to explain any of this. The NK target would have gone down after a full day's discussion, instead of immediately, effectively handing the scum two NKs in a row.
You had a one in
four chance of hitting scum. PM was already dead by then.
You yourself have pointed out
repeatedly that if you were wrong you'd be fucked. Now you're saying that it was both totally worth it and totally unreasonable to assume you might get lynched for it.
In other words, you've stopped panicking and are now defending your actions as reasonable and proper. Unbelievable.
Frankly, you do a terrible impression of me. How about i correct you :
Day 1 was : Screw it, whatever i say Leaf will use to chainlynch me. Not voting Zrk : scumpartner! Vote Zrk : hes trying to bus!!!1!
. Fuck those assholes ( Jim was getting included here. He always get included in those cases.)
Day 2: ''Hey, new day. I'm the first poster. Hmm, do i try a big move ? Or do i wait for leafsnail to keep his tunnel going ? Won't get another chance anyway. Moo, Leaf.''
If his arguments were complete and utter bullshit, why were you utterly convinced he could singlehandedly get you lynched?