2. If it helps or not... the results can't really be measured. It is pretty frequented after all...
No, seriously, stuff like that does exactly jack except polarize where polarization isn't going to help. It pisses off the people it's targeted it against and helps fuel poor impressions from everyone else. It does nothing good. The most that I can see coming from it is self-aggrandizement from people that already hold the same opinion.
If you want to bring attention to injustice, actual accounts of injustice is going to do more than an asshole ranting, especially in the manner and style that one did. He/she/it touched on such, but that kind of thing doesn't need more than the act itself to be seen in a poor light.
Most of the stuff I could say approaches genuinely useful is near the bottom, after most folks that kind of thing
could help are already going to have turned off their willingness to listen.
I'll admit, though, that that kind of approach to presenting opinions and enacting social change is something that just gets under my skin. I've never seen it do anything except get people derailed into pointless character attacks on each other or similar sorts of bullshit. It's something we could really stand to frakking stop if we're going to do anything meaningful
3. It is basically a blog. Hence, he put down his opinion.
Chairman P, not the fellow at the other end of link. P had good intentions
Author
Topic: Occupying Wallstreet (Read 297454 times)