Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 103 104 [105] 106 107 ... 297

Author Topic: Occupying Wallstreet  (Read 297917 times)

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1560 on: November 16, 2011, 05:00:11 pm »

You'd be surprised. There are a disturbingly large number of people who vocally wonder why the cops don't just shoot all those dirty socialist hippies. I have a few friendships that are nearing their end as a result of attitudes like that. And one of them is a cop.  :-\
"No, MSH", everyone tells me, "You are intolerant of police officers who are all reasonable and normal people. Why must you always cherry pick bad cases!" Bah.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Realmfighter

  • Bay Watcher
  • Yeaah?
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1561 on: November 16, 2011, 05:11:46 pm »

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
I love you socialist hippy bastards~~~
Logged
We may not be as brave as Gryffindor, as willing to get our hands dirty as Hufflepuff, or as devious as Slytherin, but there is nothing, nothing more dangerous than a little too much knowledge and a conscience that is open to debate

RedKing

  • Bay Watcher
  • hoo hoo motherfucker
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1562 on: November 16, 2011, 05:18:27 pm »

You'd be surprised. There are a disturbingly large number of people who vocally wonder why the cops don't just shoot all those dirty socialist hippies. I have a few friendships that are nearing their end as a result of attitudes like that. And one of them is a cop.  :-\
"No, MSH", everyone tells me, "You are intolerant of police officers who are all reasonable and normal people. Why must you always cherry pick bad cases!" Bah.
Yeah, I'm severely disappointed. We've had some serious online dustups over this the last couple of months.  :(
Logged

Remember, knowledge is power. The power to make other people feel stupid.
Quote from: Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Science is like an inoculation against charlatans who would have you believe whatever it is they tell you.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1563 on: November 16, 2011, 05:26:13 pm »

Actually, I've learned that there are more good cops out there than I thought.  I've also been surprised at just how much it seems to depend on the location, too.  Most places have not had nearly as much trouble as Oakland, Boston, and NY.  Some have been almost friendly.  The thing that has become most clear is that decent people in the police force have absolutely no sway over the behavior of corrupt co-workers.  The institution as a whole is completely fucked up.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1564 on: November 16, 2011, 05:29:03 pm »

It's only been, what a month or so? The civil rights movement took YEARS. So long as people have the determination to see this through, things will change.
A difference is that the civil rights movement, when it did well, usually had some pretty specific demands.  Like getting rid of this racist law, stopping that racist practise etc.  Occupy just... well, doesn't really seem to have that.
Logged

Nadaka

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nadaka.us
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1565 on: November 16, 2011, 05:35:49 pm »

It's only been, what a month or so? The civil rights movement took YEARS. So long as people have the determination to see this through, things will change.
A difference is that the civil rights movement, when it did well, usually had some pretty specific demands.  Like getting rid of this racist law, stopping that racist practise etc.  Occupy just... well, doesn't really seem to have that.

And the civil rights movement was what? a century old? before it got the majority of the equality that was demanded.
Logged
Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back...
I don't care cause I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me...

I turned myself into a monster, to fight against the monsters of the world.

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1566 on: November 16, 2011, 05:41:16 pm »

Sure, but I don't see how that's relevant to what I just said.
Logged

Nadaka

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nadaka.us
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1567 on: November 16, 2011, 05:53:17 pm »

OWS is a brand new movement without any formal structure or leadership. It is damn near impossible for "pretty specific demands" to be their focus at this point.

There are problems identified, points of view shared, and general demands already.

It is relevant because you are comparing the effectiveness of a movement that had generations to develop and perfect its message to one that is barely started.

I would also point out that a lot of the problems that OWS are far more difficult to pin down specific issues because they are intentionally obfuscated from the public. "Blacks must sit at the back of the bus" is far more publicly obvious than the graft and corruption that is disenfranchising the people of this nation. I'll point to one of the more recent civil rights successes. It has taken more than 50 years to correct inequity in farm subsidies that were unofficially but systematically denied to black farmers but granted to white farmers. It took that long in part because it wasn't as apparent.
Logged
Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back...
I don't care cause I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me...

I turned myself into a monster, to fight against the monsters of the world.

darkflagrance

  • Bay Watcher
  • Carry on, carry on
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1568 on: November 16, 2011, 05:53:57 pm »

It's only been, what a month or so? The civil rights movement took YEARS. So long as people have the determination to see this through, things will change.
A difference is that the civil rights movement, when it did well, usually had some pretty specific demands.  Like getting rid of this racist law, stopping that racist practise etc.  Occupy just... well, doesn't really seem to have that.

Occupy as a whole perhaps, but the single local one I attended had a list of specific conditions for the local administration and had even entered negotiations with a union over some of their conditions. Perhaps the same is true for at least some other local Occupys?
Logged
...as if nothing really matters...
   
The Legend of Tholtig Cryptbrain: 8000 dead elves and a cyclops

Tired of going decades without goblin sieges? Try The Fortress Defense Mod

Powder Miner

  • Bay Watcher
  • this avatar is years irrelevant again oh god oh f-
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1569 on: November 16, 2011, 06:04:30 pm »

snip- this part isn't what i'm responding to.

What we're fighting today is the fact that a relative handful of people own most of the planet and don't want to share, even if it means impoverishing 90% of the global population.  This can only go one of three ways.  Incredible numbers of people meekly resign themselves to starvation and homelessness, we convince the 1% to limit their greed, or we hurt them.
Ugh, I won't get into how much
I hate the "it's their duty to share" ideology, but
Quote
or we hurt them
GARGH... really?

Spoiler: Political rant (click to show/hide)
Logged

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1570 on: November 16, 2011, 06:09:40 pm »

I would also point out that a lot of the problems that OWS are far more difficult to pin down specific issues because they are intentionally obfuscated from the public. "Blacks must sit at the back of the bus" is far more publicly obvious than the graft and corruption that is disenfranchising the people of this nation. I'll point to one of the more recent civil rights successes. It has taken more than 50 years to correct inequity in farm subsidies that were unofficially but systematically denied to black farmers but granted to white farmers. It took that long in part because it wasn't as apparent.

I'll repeat this just to back up your point, as an example.

"4 Ways the Poor Get Screwed That Everyone Takes for Granted"

Obfuscation is one of the main problems in the modern world with establishing productive criticism that is understandable to a large audience.  Much of it relies on pointing out how subtle things that are seen as completely ordinary by most people have widespread consequences that aren't immediately obvious or easy to explain.  There is tons of counter-culture literature on this subject.  How many people do you know with the capacity to honestly appreciate the concept of The Society of the Spectacle?


Edit:

Powder Miner, I don't even need to debate with you whether you are right or wrong on your points.  It is a simple fact that large amounts of people, and a substantial portion of them every bit as intelligent and hard-working as the super rich, are facing homelessness, starvation, and lack of needed medical care.  They are fighting for self-preservation.  No amount of reasoning is going to convince them to stop fighting for their own survival.  Whether or not the haves truly earned everything they have, this is going to come down to the simple fact that they share or people die.  If they choose not to share, then the people will attempt to take in order to avoid dying.

This has always been a feature of society to some extent, but civilization has always gone through cycles where resources get too concentrated in too few hands and too many people are made to suffer to be shunted off to the fringes of society where they can be ignored.  Right now, we're at that point in the cycle again.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 06:15:07 pm by SalmonGod »
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Powder Miner

  • Bay Watcher
  • this avatar is years irrelevant again oh god oh f-
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1571 on: November 16, 2011, 06:27:51 pm »

Powder Miner, I don't even need to debate with you whether you are right or wrong on your points.
Yes you do.
Quote
It is a simple fact that large amounts of people, and a substantial portion of them every bit as intelligent and hard-working as the super rich, are facing homelessness, starvation, and lack of needed medical care.
Doesn't mean you should punish the rich (It's not even just the super-rich)
Quote
They are fighting for self-preservation.  No amount of reasoning is going to convince them to stop fighting for their own survival.
We can't say the same about improving the economy can we?
Quote
Whether or not the haves truly earned everything they have, this is going to come down to the simple fact that they share or people die.  If they choose not to share, then the people will attempt to take in order to avoid dying.
A: "They share or people die"? Not really. People always die no matter what you do, and my view on things is that if you force equality, everyone fights for survival. This is not what is preferred. And if they do attempt to forcibly take, that is what police are for. I don't care who you are, I do not condone robbery.

Quote
This has always been a feature of society to some extent, but civilization has always gone through cycles where resources get too concentrated in too few hands and too many people are made to suffer to be shunted off to the fringes of society where they can be ignored.
Not really actually, not at all. Middle classes are a rare thing. They've only really ever existed in modern life and in Rome. Saying that we're in a cycle and this is a point is incorrect- that cycle never existed. Historically, most of civilization has been rich and poor. There's no cycle, and the problem we have to deal with now is the restrictions on business- less money in businesses equals less money for jobs equals less jobs equals more poor and starving people. This same equalizing approach has been tried by Europe, and well look at them now. Equalizing doesn't work.
[/quote]
Logged

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1572 on: November 16, 2011, 06:30:59 pm »

I'll just pop in and say one thing about people "earning" money.

In our society, only one talent is really rewarded: business management. The geniuses and hard workers, working in the lab and making the product? They get manipulated. Their talents and hard work may actually be what causes the outgoing product to be good, but what keeps the business running are the executives, and they get all the money.

Anyone who thinks people should be rewarded relative to their prowess should absolutely loathe our system.
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.

Powder Miner

  • Bay Watcher
  • this avatar is years irrelevant again oh god oh f-
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1573 on: November 16, 2011, 06:34:03 pm »

I'll just pop in and say one thing about people "earning" money.

In our society, only one talent is really rewarded: business management. The geniuses and hard workers, working in the lab and making the product? They get manipulated. Their talents and hard work may actually be what causes the outgoing product to be good, but what keeps the business running are the executives, and they get all the money.

Anyone who thinks people should be rewarded relative to their prowess should absolutely loathe our system.

I do, but not in the way you think. The whole union system (prepared to take flak here) Is what prevents them from getting higher wages- Wages have to be equal.
Logged

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1574 on: November 16, 2011, 06:36:04 pm »

And removing unions would prevent the geniuses and hard workers from being milked and manipulated... how?
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.
Pages: 1 ... 103 104 [105] 106 107 ... 297