Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 77 78 [79] 80 81 ... 297

Author Topic: Occupying Wallstreet  (Read 294440 times)

KaelGotDwarves

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CREATURE:FIRE_ELF]
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1170 on: October 29, 2011, 07:29:02 pm »

Pnx

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1171 on: October 29, 2011, 08:12:47 pm »

Unfortunately, I'm afraid the kind of change desired would require an organized front akin to a political party, because they you could elect members with direct lawmaking/administrative authority. The problem being that the views currently being expressed are so wide in range that one doesn't quite know what to make of them sometimes. Though "inequality in the distribution of wealth" is a historical one people seem to agree on here, I dunno. Moreover, there's a danger of being Ross Perot as a spoiler party that takes democratic votes away and thereby hands the election to the party you least agree with. In this case, that would be Rick Perry.... :(
I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up. I did sort of drop a hint at this a while back.

If you want to get some kind of change done you have to associate the occupy movement with a third political party. I've been pretty damn tempted to start one myself, although there's more than a few things standing in the way of that.

What I'd do is emphasize neutrality on most fronts to avoid splitting the vote too much, and in this theme I'd pick purple as the colour, and dove as the animal. Then set the main party hard line as being political and financial reform. Then start trying to get occupy protesters to take up the banner. Start handing out leaflets, encourage people to do so at all the other occupy locations, make them something with that purple dove at the top.
Start handing out pins, or heck, winter is coming, start dying winter hats purple, hand them out.
Once the media catches on to the fact that a lot of people at these protests are walking around with purple pins or hats on then the movement can snowball from there.

As for splitting the democratic vote, I think a lot of conservatives are feeling rather disillusioned, there's also a massive number of people who don't vote at all. If you can fight people's apathy and encourage them to vote you can do it. You can do it all.

EDIT:
... or heck, winter is coming, start dying winter hats purple, hand them out.
I can't believe I just said that.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2011, 08:21:28 pm by Pnx »
Logged

palsch

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1172 on: October 29, 2011, 08:48:08 pm »

What I'd do is emphasize neutrality on most fronts to avoid splitting the vote too much, and in this theme I'd pick purple as the colour...
Interestingly the UK reform movement that died a (partial) death during the AV referendum used purple for the Take Back Parliament campaign. I'm pretty sure a fair number of the same people are involved in both movements.

And note that they very much weren't and aren't a political party. I've known members from at least three UK parties (Green, Labour, Lib Dem) who held elected office at the time they supported the campaign and the protests it created. And that was just in York.

I'd argue that trying to get a third party elected or even just individuals to represent the movement is rather futile, especially in the US. I'm pretty sure you would need an entire stage of electoral and structural reform before a third party could have serious policy implemented. You are far better off trying to shift the positions of the elected officials from the major parties.

Take each politician as an individual. Confront them with your policy priorities and ask for their take on them. Those who are supportive get endorsed, those who aren't get condemned. Make peoples position over equality and other significant issues here as important and as much a part of public awareness as their positions on abortion.

It's only part of what should come out of this, but it would be nice to see.
Logged

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1173 on: October 29, 2011, 08:59:43 pm »

I think the system (economic and political) is totally fucked and we need to develop an alternative that people can turn to that exists in parallel with the existing establishment, without being in direct conflict.

I actually have an idea on this point that I've been mulling over the last three days or so -- and not my usual abstract daydreaming that nobody sees any use in.  An actual thing.  I've been imagining a web-based social media organization tool, designed to facilitate an informal, mutualistic economy.  I wonder if enough people at this point would be receptive to such a thing to make it a practical tool for relieving some of the burden of failure of the current economic and political structures.  Other such tools are already popping up all over the web, but not to the scale that I'm imagining.  I'll post more on it in the near future.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

kaijyuu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hrm...
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1174 on: October 29, 2011, 09:00:52 pm »

Yeah I don't see a new political party working the US unless one of the current parties goes under. At best (worst?) you'll get a repeat of the bull moose party, and it somewhat unlikely you'll even do that.
Logged
Quote from: Chesterton
For, in order that men should resist injustice, something more is necessary than that they should think injustice unpleasant. They must think injustice absurd; above all, they must think it startling. They must retain the violence of a virgin astonishment. When the pessimist looks at any infamy, it is to him, after all, only a repetition of the infamy of existence. But the optimist sees injustice as something discordant and unexpected, and it stings him into action.

Pnx

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1175 on: October 29, 2011, 10:41:10 pm »

Eh, I was going to try to formulate a retort, but I just don't have the spirit for it at the heart of it all.
I'm not sure how on earth I'm supposed to fight voter apathy if I'm too apathetic to do it.
Logged

Zangi

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1176 on: October 29, 2011, 11:13:45 pm »

Unfortunately, I'm afraid the kind of change desired would require an organized front akin to a political party, because they you could elect members with direct lawmaking/administrative authority. The problem being that the views currently being expressed are so wide in range that one doesn't quite know what to make of them sometimes. Though "inequality in the distribution of wealth" is a historical one people seem to agree on here, I dunno. Moreover, there's a danger of being Ross Perot as a spoiler party that takes democratic votes away and thereby hands the election to the party you least agree with. In this case, that would be Rick Perry.... :(

Also, it might interest you that in certain legal circles, a lot of discussion has been made about the Officer who shot the protester in the head with a "non lethal" round. This is especially true if he dies from complications to that shot. Criminal charges against the officer would probably be limited to excessive force and he would probably (legitimately?) beat any manslaughter charges for one simple reason. He was told it was a non lethal round and probably honestly believed that. Now, an argument could be made that he knew not to shoot to the head and if it can be proved that was intentional, then it might stick. Simply, he probably lacked the intent to kill. This speaks only to criminal rather than disciplinary charges such as him getting fired.
Well... here is the kicker, current laws and regulations relating to elections make it so that it is really really hard for a 3rd party to come up.  Some may say its nigh impossible, considering the current politicians and lobbyists have every reason to keep the status...  knowing that money talks loud with the current seats and well... less competition.
Logged
All life begins with Nu and ends with Nu...  This is the truth! This is my belief! ... At least for now...
FMA/FMA:B Recommendation

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1177 on: October 29, 2011, 11:22:41 pm »

Take each politician as an individual. Confront them with your policy priorities and ask for their take on them. Those who are supportive get endorsed, those who aren't get condemned. Make peoples position over equality and other significant issues here as important and as much a part of public awareness as their positions on abortion.

Or the right to bear arms.  The NRA is the poster child for a successful public lobbying effort by public citizens on the nation level.  I hate the policies they advocate but admire the effectiveness with which they have pursued them.  They have not only organized supporters into an effective coalition but they have very effectively made use of the fault lines and quirks of our voting system.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

ECrownofFire

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Dragoness
    • View Profile
    • ECrownofFire
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1178 on: October 30, 2011, 02:12:52 am »

Relevant to lobbying:

Why not just have politicians wear patches on their suits with their "sponsors" on it, like NASCAR drivers? With patch size relative to the "donations"?
Logged

Bdthemag

  • Bay Watcher
  • Die Wacht am Rhein
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1179 on: October 30, 2011, 02:20:00 am »

Relevant to lobbying:

Why not just have politicians wear patches on their suits with their "sponsors" on it, like NASCAR drivers? With patch size relative to the "donations"?
Im sure a majority of major politicians would just have an entire suit with a companies name printed all over it then.
Logged
Well, you do have a busy life, what with keeping tabs on wild, rough-and-tumble forum members while sorting out the drama between your twenty two inner lesbians.
Your drunk posts continue to baffle me.
Welcome to Reality.

Protactinium

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CAN_SALT:CHILD]
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1180 on: October 30, 2011, 02:53:14 am »

Take each politician as an individual. Confront them with your policy priorities and ask for their take on them. Those who are supportive get endorsed, those who aren't get condemned. Make peoples position over equality and other significant issues here as important and as much a part of public awareness as their positions on abortion.

Or the right to bear arms.  The NRA is the poster child for a successful public lobbying effort by public citizens on the nation level.  I hate the policies they advocate but admire the effectiveness with which they have pursued them.  They have not only organized supporters into an effective coalition but they have very effectively made use of the fault lines and quirks of our voting system.

Another unfortunate detail about the NRA is how political the leadership of the group still acts. In current times, the NRA is still pro-Republicans even though President Obama has shown the gun-rights advocates no harm. The public citizens are still followers of a corrupt lobbying leader, so I'm a little hesitant to celebrate the NRA as an example of citizen-level lobbying.

Though I will agree with you on the greater timespan, yes. The NRA is an effective coalition that lobby for citizen rights.
Logged
The thing that confuses me about dorfs is this. Dorf 1 dies in an avalance or somesuch. Dorf 2 is friends with dorf 3 and dorf 1. Dorf 2 berserks because of his friends death and kills dorf 3. also a friend. W. T. F.
Clearly you've never been drunk.

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1181 on: October 30, 2011, 02:54:10 am »

Relevant to lobbying:

Why not just have politicians wear patches on their suits with their "sponsors" on it, like NASCAR drivers? With patch size relative to the "donations"?
Im sure a majority of major politicians would just have an entire suit with a companies name printed all over it then.

And that's a bad thing?
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."

Gantolandon

  • Bay Watcher
  • He has a fertile imagination.
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1182 on: October 30, 2011, 05:04:35 am »

Quote
I think the system (economic and political) is totally fucked and we need to develop an alternative that people can turn to that exists in parallel with the existing establishment, without being in direct conflict.

I second this and I'm surprised so few people seem to bring that up.

It's quite stupid to have a system where you're supposed to elect your representatives, but have no control over them. They are not even legally bound to do the very stuff they promised during the election campaign. How is this even supposed to work?

Logged

Reiina

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1183 on: October 30, 2011, 05:50:21 am »

Quote
I think the system (economic and political) is totally fucked and we need to develop an alternative that people can turn to that exists in parallel with the existing establishment, without being in direct conflict.

I second this and I'm surprised so few people seem to bring that up.

It's quite stupid to have a system where you're supposed to elect your representatives, but have no control over them. They are not even legally bound to do the very stuff they promised during the election campaign. How is this even supposed to work?

You're not supposed to elect them a 2nd time if they do that :).
Logged

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1184 on: October 30, 2011, 06:07:22 am »

Yeah, you're supposed to elect the other major party. Who did exactly the same the last time they got elected.
Logged
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.
Pages: 1 ... 77 78 [79] 80 81 ... 297