Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 264 265 [266] 267 268 ... 297

Author Topic: Occupying Wallstreet  (Read 294368 times)

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3975 on: October 24, 2012, 09:35:56 am »

Then they'll be fine. If they weren't even in the city, they can hardly be indicted for crimes committed in the city.

I'm sure they'll be fine after 18 months in solitary confinement...

And I do admit that all the writing on this that I've seen was biased in nature, but it still seems like these three are being questioned for everything they know about other anarchists and activism in general in the area... not just about this specific crime that is supposedly being investigated.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 09:38:29 am by SalmonGod »
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

sluissa

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3976 on: October 24, 2012, 09:40:23 am »

Okay, were the three people who were arrested not in Seattle? or were the people they were asking about not in the city? Even if those three weren't in Seattle at the time doesn't mean they don't know anything about what was going on. If they were part of the same organization than it stands to reason they might know something about what was going on that day and who was involved.

« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 10:11:22 am by sluissa »
Logged

palsch

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3977 on: October 24, 2012, 09:48:08 am »

And I do admit that all the writing on this that I've seen was biased in nature, but it still seems like these three are being questioned for everything they know about other anarchists and activism in general in the area... not just about this specific crime that is supposedly being investigated.
As sluissa said, this is a grand jury investigation that appears to have a broad scope.

The purpose of a grand jury is to investigate *something* to determine what individuals can be charged with what crimes. Sometimes these investigations are nebulous, focused on general groups or organisations rather than any particular events or individuals.

In this case it seems it's a grand jury investigating general violent crime related to anarchist groups in the Pacific Northwest.

I would note that these specific people had specific crimes (even if not their own) they were being questioned about. That is, the property damage at the protest and the federal crime of crossing state lines in order to riot. Something in the investigation suggested these people might have information related to those crimes, so they were subpoenaed to testify.

It's possible a that intimidation of such groups was a (misguided) element of this decision, and that the investigation has illiberal intentions. But given the public facts about this it looks pretty much the same as due process from here.
Logged

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3978 on: October 24, 2012, 11:26:04 am »

That's the very definition of political persecution, though.  "We're launching an investigation into an entire political belief to see if any of them have committed crimes."  In principle, that's exactly like racial profiling.  If a democrat or republican ever commits a crime and their political organizations are investigated in the same manner, I'll no longer complain.

Of course, this all rests on the strong impression that the scope of this investigation goes beyond the specific vandalisms on May Day, which may or may not be true.  I don't really have a problem with law enforcement of a specific crime... although the involvement of the Joint Terrorism Task Force is  highly questionable and the ability to hold someone who has committed no crime in solitary confinement for 18 months (which has a 100% likelihood of causing permanent psychological trauma) is absolutely horrendous.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 11:38:37 am by SalmonGod »
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3979 on: October 24, 2012, 11:32:29 am »

They have reason to believe that this anarchist group was the primary initiator of the May Day crimes, which means that an investigation into the group is not only the appropriate course of action but perhaps the only course of action.

Chapters of the Republicans and Democrats have been investigated before, usually for voter fraud if I recall correctly.

It isn't like the organization is being outlawed, and if the investigation, being an investigation, finds that the members didn't actually do anything, then nothing more will happen here.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Mictlantecuhtli

  • Bay Watcher
  • Grinning God of Death
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3980 on: October 24, 2012, 11:37:48 am »

I honestly don't give a damn if the US government 'discriminates' against terrorist [in this case a joke of an anarcho-liberal commune] groups. It's because there's previous precedent for them to follow: you do not simply ignore organizations like these since if something were to occur there would be bays for blood, and their aggressive actions [possibly even further aggressive plans, but we do not know since the conspirators won't talk] only serve help their justification of acting in such a way towards the anarchists.

Our judicial system isn't the way you think it is. Honestly, you can't keep screeching about how the government is irredeemably corrupt whilst you're talking about a transparent operation with the details of it all over the damn internet.

It isn't like the organization is being outlawed, and if the investigation, being an investigation, finds that the members didn't actually do anything, then nothing more will happen here.
Logged
I am surrounded by flesh and bone, I am a temple of living. Maybe I'll maybe my life away.

Santorum leaves a bad taste in my mouth,
Card-carrying Liberaltarian

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3981 on: October 24, 2012, 11:39:48 am »

And now you're equating vandalism with terrorism...

Chapters of the Republicans and Democrats have been investigated before, usually for voter fraud if I recall correctly.

But I sincerely doubt their doors were kicked in, most of their possessions confiscated, and people thrown into extended solitary confinement.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Mictlantecuhtli

  • Bay Watcher
  • Grinning God of Death
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3982 on: October 24, 2012, 11:44:55 am »

And now you're equating vandalism with terrorism...

Okay. What is the next plan after you intimidate the local authorities with vandalism? Everyone gathers hands? Or do you continue similar actions since the original violent action was successful?
Logged
I am surrounded by flesh and bone, I am a temple of living. Maybe I'll maybe my life away.

Santorum leaves a bad taste in my mouth,
Card-carrying Liberaltarian

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3983 on: October 24, 2012, 11:47:21 am »

And now you're equating vandalism with terrorism...

Okay. What is the next plan after you intimidate the local authorities with vandalism? Everyone gathers hands? Or do you continue similar actions since the original violent action was successful?

I'm not defending the action, but I'm also not accepting the argument that because someone has committed a smaller crime you can go ahead and assign them a label associated with much larger crimes.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3984 on: October 24, 2012, 11:48:04 am »

Chapters of the Republicans and Democrats have been investigated before, usually for voter fraud if I recall correctly.

But I sincerely doubt their doors were kicked in, most of their possessions confiscated, and people thrown into extended solitary confinement.
The police had a search warrant, the possessions are evidence if the suspected crime turns out to be legit, and she was thrown into solitary confinement because she refused to speak to a grand jury after being granted total immunity from prosecution.

You may not like that she had a legal obligation to participate in this, but the justice system will never go anywhere if it is a totally voluntary system.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3985 on: October 24, 2012, 11:55:26 am »

Chapters of the Republicans and Democrats have been investigated before, usually for voter fraud if I recall correctly.

But I sincerely doubt their doors were kicked in, most of their possessions confiscated, and people thrown into extended solitary confinement.
The police had a search warrant, the possessions are evidence if the suspected crime turns out to be legit, and she was thrown into solitary confinement because she refused to speak to a grand jury after being granted total immunity from prosecution.

You may not like that she had a legal obligation to participate in this, but the justice system will never go anywhere if it is a totally voluntary system.

No.  What I don't like is that they're receiving the fullest possible force of the law because their political beliefs are disfavored.  They don't have to carry out procedure in the most harmful manner possible, and they wouldn't do so if investigating a more mainstream organization.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Mictlantecuhtli

  • Bay Watcher
  • Grinning God of Death
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3986 on: October 24, 2012, 11:57:35 am »

And now you're equating vandalism with terrorism...

Okay. What is the next plan after you intimidate the local authorities with vandalism? Everyone gathers hands? Or do you continue similar actions since the original violent action was successful?

I'm not defending the action, but I'm also not accepting the argument that because someone has committed a smaller crime you can go ahead and assign them a label associated with much larger crimes.

Ter·ror·ism
[ter-uh-riz-uhm]
noun
1.
the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
2.
the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3.
a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.


There's left wing terrorism too, friend.
Logged
I am surrounded by flesh and bone, I am a temple of living. Maybe I'll maybe my life away.

Santorum leaves a bad taste in my mouth,
Card-carrying Liberaltarian

Nadaka

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nadaka.us
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3987 on: October 24, 2012, 11:58:48 am »

And now you're equating vandalism with terrorism...

Okay. What is the next plan after you intimidate the local authorities with vandalism? Everyone gathers hands? Or do you continue similar actions since the original violent action was successful?

I'm not defending the action, but I'm also not accepting the argument that because someone has committed a smaller crime you can go ahead and assign them a label associated with much larger crimes.

Ter·ror·ism
[ter-uh-riz-uhm]
noun
1.
the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
2.
the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3.
a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

Thank you. The Grand Jury are clearly terrorists.
Logged
Take me out to the black, tell them I ain't comin' back...
I don't care cause I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me...

I turned myself into a monster, to fight against the monsters of the world.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3988 on: October 24, 2012, 12:02:27 pm »

No.  What I don't like is that they're receiving the fullest possible force of the law because their political beliefs are disfavored.  They don't have to carry out procedure in the most harmful manner possible, and they wouldn't do so if investigating a more mainstream organization.
Until you have anything to back that up besides the assertions of some radical news blogs, I don't see us going anywhere with this.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Mictlantecuhtli

  • Bay Watcher
  • Grinning God of Death
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #3989 on: October 24, 2012, 12:03:08 pm »

Thank you. The Grand Jury are clearly terrorists.

And, pray tell, what were the motivations for the vandalism? And: do you agree with attacking federal buildings to attempt to sway public opinion in your way?
Logged
I am surrounded by flesh and bone, I am a temple of living. Maybe I'll maybe my life away.

Santorum leaves a bad taste in my mouth,
Card-carrying Liberaltarian
Pages: 1 ... 264 265 [266] 267 268 ... 297