Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 86 87 [88] 89 90 ... 297

Author Topic: Occupying Wallstreet  (Read 289776 times)

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1305 on: November 01, 2011, 08:06:33 pm »

Actually On Topic

Thanks.  That was fantastic.

I've been out for a couple days.  Just caught back up.

Income inequality is a concept I understand and which the solutions to are well known.

Please share?...
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Tellemurius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Positively insane Tech Thaumaturgist
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1307 on: November 02, 2011, 01:18:56 am »

Denver got some problems right now, we got a division right now whether to fight back the current police crackdown with violence or let them be dragged away.

SirAaronIII

  • Bay Watcher
  • Western Romanticist
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1308 on: November 02, 2011, 01:26:39 am »

Let them be dragged away. If you fight back, the whole movement looks bad ("oh aren't they the ones that had that little fight with the cops? they're OBVIOUSLY evil and wrong!") but if you let them be dragged away, they get dragged away (which sucks) at the expense of the image of the police/city ("they arrested some of those poor protesters! we should support the little guy!").

Not everyone will think like this, but it's still probably best to avoid confrontations.
Logged
"I want to watch the sun setting below the horizon, thinking about my significance in this world. That's my dream."

Tellemurius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Positively insane Tech Thaumaturgist
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1309 on: November 02, 2011, 01:32:15 am »

Let them be dragged away. If you fight back, the whole movement looks bad ("oh aren't they the ones that had that little fight with the cops? they're OBVIOUSLY evil and wrong!") but if you let them be dragged away, they get dragged away (which sucks) at the expense of the image of the police/city ("they arrested some of those poor protesters! we should support the little guy!").

Not everyone will think like this, but it's still probably best to avoid confrontations.
Too late, last week cops rolled in due to couple of tards knocking a cop off his motorcycle, somehow it got blown out of proportion and riot gear was equipped.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/denver-police-use-force-against-occupy-protesters-after-marchers-advance-on-capitol/2011/10/29/gIQAtPwcTM_story.html


riot gear equipment:
DP is really not to be fucked. converted ARs to fire pepper shots, modern riot armor to the point the cops can literally take a whack from a lawn chair and can still be standing, instead of police batons they have more of a shortstaff with a wider reach and emphasis for close-range with two hands, and there is a suit for every cop everyone is trained for riot duty.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2011, 01:41:56 am by Tellemurius »
Logged

Lagslayer

  • Bay Watcher
  • stand-up philosopher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1310 on: November 02, 2011, 01:39:03 am »

Important information regarding the Occupy Richmond event



Quote
The Oakland Police Officer's Association is kinda pissed with the mayor right now.
Seems like the police just want consistency more than anything right now. I don't blame them.

Let them be dragged away. If you fight back, the whole movement looks bad ("oh aren't they the ones that had that little fight with the cops? they're OBVIOUSLY evil and wrong!") but if you let them be dragged away, they get dragged away (which sucks) at the expense of the image of the police/city ("they arrested some of those poor protesters! we should support the little guy!").

Not everyone will think like this, but it's still probably best to avoid confrontations.
There was no problem with the protest until they started breaking the tent law, and some of the protesters got uppity about it. If this is more widely known, then then the Occupy Denver group as a whole might break even if the rest remain peaceful, but violence would make them look like thugs. The police were just doing their job.

Tellemurius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Positively insane Tech Thaumaturgist
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1311 on: November 02, 2011, 01:44:23 am »

Well the tent law is more targeted to the vagrancy of Denver not the protesters. For the protester parts they moved into federal areas or lay out a tarp and suffer (that requires some heavy balls considering we got a blizzard right now)

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1312 on: November 02, 2011, 01:56:18 am »

riot gear equipment:
DP is really not to be fucked. converted ARs to fire pepper shots, modern riot armor to the point the cops can literally take a whack from a lawn chair and can still be standing, instead of police batons they have more of a shortstaff with a wider reach and emphasis for close-range with two hands, and there is a suit for every cop everyone is trained for riot duty.

I wonder how many times I'm going to have reason to link this in this thread :P

The police were just doing their job.

Am I the only one who gets tired of that line being used as if it's a valid justification for anything?  Not that I don't understand.  They have families to feed and such.  But then the only police getting criticism are the ones acting more malicious then their job necessitates.  If they are in fact being ordered to act with a sort of meanness not required by law, then they are in fact not doing their jobs.  Their job is to protect and serve and uphold the law, not to do the exact opposite whenever they're told.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Tellemurius

  • Bay Watcher
  • Positively insane Tech Thaumaturgist
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1313 on: November 02, 2011, 02:04:29 am »

Well DP is efficient, they roll into the crowd surround their target and walk right out with person/s gun and stick aiming at the pissed off counterparts. Haven't heard any of them going ballistic.

I think i have one of those shirts somewhere :P

Truean

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ok.... [sigh] It froze over....
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1314 on: November 02, 2011, 02:05:44 am »

Time for some tasty linkage;

The Oakland Police Officer's Association is kinda pissed with the mayor right now.

Dear Oakland Police Officers

I represent numerous criminal defendants in another jurisdiction against police abuses. I do believe you when you say you are confused. You've categorically denied using "non-lethal" bullets against peaceful protesters, but there is very clearly a military veteran suffering brain damage from exactly such a weapon by your officers. Your mayor is attempting to protect you from massive legal liability, an escalation in protesting caused by your excessive force, and possible job loss for cause You owe her an apology and thank you note. I do not practice law in your jurisdiction; if I did I would love to peruse many actionable and even winnable claims based on these facts.

We need real officers NOW who will step up and properly do their jobs without violating the constitution – not send mixed messages. Thank you for listening.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/occupy-oakland-did-police-use-flashbangs-and-rubber-bullets-on-protesters/2011/10/26/gIQAL4pOJM_blog.html

Slowly replace and fire each and every single officer who does not disavow this statement with officers from other cities/new recruits. That's one of the many things I'd do in the mayor's position.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2011, 02:46:09 am by Truean »
Logged
The kinda human wreckage that you love

Current Spare Time Fiction Project: (C) 2010 http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=63660.0
Disclaimer: I never take cases online for ethical reasons. If you require an attorney; you need to find one licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Never take anything online as legal advice, because each case is different and one size does not fit all. Wants nothing at all to do with law.

Please don't quote me.

ECrownofFire

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Dragoness
    • View Profile
    • ECrownofFire
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1315 on: November 02, 2011, 03:55:23 am »

I thought this was amusing and semi-relevant.

Spoiler: "Scumbag Socialist" (click to show/hide)
Logged

Rose

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Elf
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1316 on: November 02, 2011, 05:22:17 am »

My boss is convinced that occupy wall-street has a major financial backing.

* Japa sighs.
Logged

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1317 on: November 02, 2011, 07:03:30 am »

What, isn't it expensive to go campaing?  You mean poor people don't spend a lot of money doing that?
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

atomicwinter

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1318 on: November 02, 2011, 07:08:27 am »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qdLa6c3hN1w

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aEDWs-KNf-0

Thought I should throw these up there. I agree with their right to protest, but none of them understand economics, even thou what this is guy is saying is very basic.
Logged

KaelGotDwarves

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CREATURE:FIRE_ELF]
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #1319 on: November 02, 2011, 07:42:51 am »

Handpicked staged encounters from a youtube channel called wideawake123 starring a CEO and uses words like "sheep" to describe the OWS protesters?

Okay.

Why not come out and throw the word "sheeple" around anyhow? At least then I know to just laugh.
Pages: 1 ... 86 87 [88] 89 90 ... 297