And your argument isn't very strong, so I'm not going to through the effort of proving it to you.
Then you have no defense from it.
Yes, I post frequently, but they're small posts with little content, I had neither the time nor will to go through the effort of scumhunting. Nothing new was going to come out of D1.
That's the very definition of active lurking. Which is why you should've said that you were busy back in day one instead of bringing it up now.
But I didn't say that is was suspicious things that Shark did that you were going back to look for, I was saying that you've been tunneling Shark and I would like you to do something other than that.
Except, by asking me to stop tunneling shark right after I say that I'm going to go look for suspicious things, that's exactly what you're saying.
But I didn't say that is was suspicious things that Shark did that you were going back to look for, I was saying that you've been tunneling Shark and I would like you to do something other than that.Which you're doing now, kudos to you. Also, I did say that... by accusing you of tunneling, it's implied that you weren't looking at anybody else. That's kind of what tunneling is...
Are you sure? You don't seem very confident about it.
You did, however point out something I missed.
Arathos: It's one thing to be tired, but to vote for someone you said was probably newbtown in the very same post? Come on. At the time, what made Shark a more likely candidate for scum than OB?
We've already been over this. Stop trying to deflect onto Arathos.
I like the intent of this post. However, you get 72 hours to figure it out and post some stuff. When you finally post a case it ends up being a massive contradiction. Instead of hunting the person who looks like the worst scum on the face of the earth(me), you go after someone you say is likely "newb town".
So, we're back to this, are we? I figured we were done harassing me about my big fuckup with voting shark when you said you understood me now.
You said, in that post "You never meant to
vote shark in the first place." This is about you making a case on someone you consider to be newb town.
You've admitted to making shit up to get Jim to stop questioning you; if that's not cracking under pressure I don't know what is. You didn't hunt scum, you didn't convince him your case on Shark was worth pursuing (or really pursue a decent case on anyone), and instead resorted to just kicking up dirt in the hopes he'd eventually give up and go away. That is the behavior of someone who is TERRIFIED of being lynched.
Okay. What's your point?
This bullshit with my misvote is just that: bullshit. See, I expected people to say "What the fuck, McArathos" and make me explain myself. I did. You accepted my explanation. Now, when the heat is on, suddenly it's suspicious again. You're looking for a scapegoat to get the heat off you.
BZZZZZZZZZZT.
Wrong. This isn't about your vote.
Thing is, if you know someone's a newb, why are you even asking him any of those questions? There are few things in that post could actually lead to you firmly believing that Shark is scum.
Really? Asking him to explain his refusal to build a case, or why he is defending instead of scumhunting can't possibly lead to proof he's scum?
No, because they also lead to proof he's a newb.
Demanding he explain why he's trying to guilt the town out of voting him with his "This could be MYLO, you can't lynch me" shit isn't attacking a scummy move? (You've done the same thing, by the way, and gave less than satisfactory answers for it).
Because he's new.
Wanting him to answer for the VERY scummy request that a vigilante reveal itself despite common sense making it clear this is only an anti-town decision isn't attacking him for scummy behavior?
He didn't know it was scummy.
Fuck that, Orangebottle. I had plenty to get out of questioning him, and I got it. He broke town, so I switched focus to you.
You're pretty pissed off about this, aren't you? If my case on you is just me looking for a scapegoat instead of an actual concern(hint: it isn't), why are you so angry about it?
Imiknorris seems to be doing exactly what others criticized me for: hopping in and pointing shit out to look active. Specifically, here, here, and here if you want some proof.
I'd like to know why.
I would like to see where you're being criticized for "hopping in and pointing shit out to look active." I can't seem to find it, unless you think that pointing things out == making things up.
Bam. Right there.
Also right here.
I've also been questioning people on the things I've pointed out. If I find something that I think is suspicious, I am going to make sure that other people see it, and I am going to get an explanation for it.
So have I.
-I'm afraid I don't see how the first example is at all what you're talking about - I was agreeing with Jim that the second nightkill was probably a vig, and asking questions of you and Shark.
-The second post was an attempt to get Native to post - I occasionally check other players' profile pages and if I see they've been online recently, but haven't posted, I assume they were lurking until told otherwise.
-The third post should have had a bit more information - I was going to question Andrew about his position on musicalcakes D2.
Compare them to my examples;
you'll find that you were doing the same thing.
What makes you think you can get away with threatening a town loss to avoid being lynched? You were even the one who pointed out that Shark was doing it. It's a scumtell, you know it is, and you did it anyway. You better have a damn good reason for it.
Not threatening, promising.
It's entirely impossible to defend myself at this point. I have been completely discredited as far as this game goes. I'm not even sure why I'm still hunting at this point, given that nobody's going to actually listen what I have to say instead of dismissing it as something from the mouth of a flailing scum.
I'd roleclaim, but that would just confuse everybody and get me lynched even harder than I'm about to be right now.
Author
Topic: Wild West Mafia - GAME OVER - Scum Win! (Read 146133 times)