Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Urist Imiknorris]

You're saying that musicalcakes has time enough to save Diakron and get people to change their votes... when he is also voting Diakron. It makes no sense.

I thought that it made a lot of sense, if you can convince 4 other people of something then you can switch your vote at the last and then get them out.

Do I really think thats what he is doing? No but I thought it would be wise to point it out...

Why? Is that what you're trying to do?

[Andrew425]

no, because that wouldn't make sense. I by doing that am painting myself as a much larger target then musical. All I am doing by saying that is putting him on the radar so he can't do that even if he wanted too.

[Urist Imiknorris]

its a little early for WIFOM isn't it?

[musicalcakes]

I thought that it made a lot of sense, if you can convince 4 other people of something then you can switch your vote at the last and then get them out.

Do I really think thats what he is doing? No but I thought it would be wise to point it out...

I still think its diakron i'm just telling musical that I have my eyes on his shenanigans

It'd be awfully tricky for me to completely change every other Diakron voter's opinion at the last second, don't you think? And I'm not even the one who led the train on Diakron.

Keep an eye on me all you want, but there won't be any shenanigans to see.

[Andrew425]

I don't doubt its tricky but hey i've seen trickier things done elsewhere. You wouldn't have to change that many peoples vote, just one of the people voting for diakron and then the other three who haven't decided.



"its a little early for WIFOM isn't it?"

I assume that means circular logic? I guess but the only to tell who is scum is to have people post a lot of stuff down and then see who messes up first. As of now diakron already did that i'm just trying to unearth the other scum guy

[Urist Imiknorris]

I assume that means circular logic?

Indeed. By pointing out that your actions would make no sense as scum, you introduce the possibility that you (as scum) could reasonably do it by arguing that it makes no sense to do as scum. Introducing this type of argument tends to be a scum move. To use your words, you messed up, and you even used the same WIFOM argument as Diakron:

If I was scum, why (think on this a little please) would I just jump out and draw attention to myself?

Also quote tags exist.

[Andrew425]

But that was kinda my point, I knew by typing that that it could be interpreted scum-like.

What i'm saying is more or less of a risk/reward scenario which didn't help me very much yet painted a larger target on my back. I guess you could interpret that as me being extra crafty but I dunno. Again the logic goes around.

[musicalcakes]

But that was kinda my point, I knew by typing that that it could be interpreted scum-like.

What i'm saying is more or less of a risk/reward scenario which didn't help me very much yet painted a larger target on my back. I guess you could interpret that as me being extra crafty but I dunno. Again the logic goes around.

Honestly? I'm not getting crafty vibes.

Really, what are you hoping to gain? Getting people to pay attention to me? They should be doing that anyway, because everyone in a mafia game should be paying attention to everyone else.

[NativeForeigner]

You're saying that musicalcakes has time enough to save Diakron and get people to change their votes... when he is also voting Diakron. It makes no sense.

I thought that it made a lot of sense, if you can convince 4 other people of something then you can switch your vote at the last and then get them out.

Do I really think thats what he is doing? No but I thought it would be wise to point it out...

I still think its diakron i'm just telling musical that I have my eyes on his shenanigans

So... you think he would get 4 other people to vote for Diakron and then he would try to bail him out? How does that even make sense to you?

[Shark]

Personally, I think Andrew must have an interesting role or something. I can't think of any reasons for a vanilla town/scum to act like he is right now. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

[Shark]

Also, survivor was listed as a possible role. Maybe he finds this scenario risk/reward because, what I can tell is that the reward for him is making people look at other people, not him.

Also all this is taking the spotlight off of diak who is conveniently not posting. Hmm...

[Simple]

Day 1

Votecount:
-Urist_McArathos:
-Jim Groovester: Diakron
-Noodlerex: Urist Imiknorris
-Urist Imiknorris:
-Andrew425: Shark
-NativeForeigner:
-Diakron: Jim Groovester, musicalcakes, NativeForeigner , Urist_McArathos , Andrew425
-Shark:
-musicalcakes:

Not Voting : noodlerex

3 more to extend, 5  more to shorten.
The Day will end Wednesday 8 PM GMT.
---
Another clarification : If you have night action it will be listed at the end of your pm. Everything else is pure flavor.

[Jim Groovester]

Personally, I think Andrew must have an interesting role or something. I can't think of any reasons for a vanilla town/scum to act like he is right now. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

Also, survivor was listed as a possible role. Maybe he finds this scenario risk/reward because, what I can tell is that the reward for him is making people look at other people, not him.

Also all this is taking the spotlight off of diak who is conveniently not posting. Hmm...

Or he's just bad. Not everything somebody does is a result of stunningly accurate deliberation and calculation.

[musicalcakes]

I will laugh if the scum team is Diakron and Andrew.

[Urist Imiknorris]

Alright, looks like Noodlerex won't be joining us at the moment.

Diakron, you had a nice little outburst then started lurking once Andrew started defending you. I know you've been online (your profile page reveals all), so where'd you go and why aren't you trying to defend yourself? Are you so resigned to being lynched (hint: that's a scumtell) that you won't even participate?