Extend and
Mormota.Still too busy to give a proper response, so you get the quick version:
Second point, I am not entirely sure what you meant, so I'm just going to explain it a bit clearer. I voted him because I generally found him suspicious and because he did not answer. I did not take the vote off him because he did not get any better and if he wanted to, he could have just explained himself. To me, it seemed as scum trying to get more time, not town trying to get more time.
I'm not talking about when you kept your vote on him, I'm talking about when you first voted him. The difference in time (as I recall) was something like 12 hours between asking him a question and voting him over not answering it, complete with the insinuation that you found that suspicious or that he was deliberately avoiding answering you. Yet, the difference between asking him said question and voting him on it was also around 12 hours (or whatever the actual time was). What was it about that time difference that was scummy and lurky for him but normal for you?
Also, you didn't address my other concern: You were suspicious of Shakerag for not scumhunting, but the only scumhunting
you were doing was calling him out on it and asking him what he meant. Doesn't that strike you as problematic?
I have shown that the logic behind your arguments was wrong. If you are still voting me, that is not out of logic, but on a gut feeling. Do you believe that is good?
Interesting. So you believe Urist to be town following his gut, and not scum pushing for a mislynch? Why's that, Mormota?
Second point: You are assuming that if someone attacks me he has to be scum? Why? If I don't find someone suspicious, why should I call them scum? To give more reasons?
I'm not assuming that if someone attacks you they have to be scum. I'm assuming that it's odd to automatically assume that someone's going after you for genuine but bad reasons rather than because they're scum. What makes you think Urist is town? Do you have reasons, or do you just assume everyone is town until they do something horribly, horribly scummy?
Please point out where and how I was doing that. Throwing unbacked shit out there is not making a clear case.
Too busy to deal with this properly, but the short version is:
You've never had any major suspicions, as I can tell because you've unvoted pretty easily each time. Feel free to provide a counterexample; you didn't the first time, so I'm assuming this is correct.
As for subtly following others' votes, Shakerag was the obvious example. You provided your own reasons for doing so, but you nonetheless voted him pretty soon after me and kept it there until his lynch.
Quickly checking back, it seems your very first vote was the fourth on Jafferey. You later claimed to be the first because the others were RVS, but that's not really a good explanation, especially since you unvoted his replacement with no fuss.
All I can find at the moment, so I'll have to go back and properly address this later. I find your general drifting with votes suspicious in general, though; unvoting and then just sitting there while the lynch went through D1 strikes me as suspicious, for instance, since while it's not a bandwagon, it shows a definite disinterest in who's lynched.