100%-scumtell #31 - when listing who is possible scum, scum includes himself.
[sarcasm]Because anyone who says "I'm not scum, I'm town" has never lied ever about it and can therefore be fully trusted.[/sarcasm]
As far as everyone else is concerned, that statement is 100% fact: I was not confirmed town Day 1, ergo I will be suspected of being the leader. I'm not concerned with hunting myself, but showing through my actions I'm not. It was more to say "let's not waste time on these guys, they're DEFINITELY not the leaders."
Let's see, I'll answer Jim's accusation on me first, then state my case.
Regardless of what the obvscum does, we should ignore him. However, my target is still McArathos.
Let's hear it, McArathos. Prove you're not the Leader.
Well, Jim, this is an impossible request for you and you know it. You've tunneled me since Day 1. You're not interested in hearing why I'm town, because you only unvote me when it's pointless. However, since you asked, I'll point out that I've been active, vocal, and giving everyone plenty of chances to read my behavior. Those are town tells, since scum like to be murky so no one is sure what to make of them. I also scumhunted actively throughout both days, and my fierce case on Dariush is something I hardly feel the need to restate here, since it was the center of attention Day 2. Scumhunting is likewise a town tell. If the fact I've been active, vocal, and scumhunting to the best of my ability is not enough proof for you all then I don't have any more proof, because that's all I've done all game long.
So, who do I suspect? Well, you for that matter
Jim.I'm sure you're already screaming OMGUS, but considered you've had a two-day headstart on me with your tunnel fest, I hardly think waiting this long to suspect you counts as a knee-jerk vote.
So, my reasons?
One, your blatant tunneling. At first I thought you were a convert, but now I think you were setting me up as an easy mislynch from the start: you called me
newbscum (among other accusations), but couldn't
back that claim up when I asked you to,
unvoting instead. You then re-vote me Day 2 for the reasons I defended and you dismissed, as seen here:
Okay, so let me see if I get this. Yesterday, after a thorough battery of questioning, you tell me "you don't have anything on (me) anyway", yet decide FIRST THING this morning that, hey, actually, you do after all? There's nothing different from your case you already dismissed yourself, yet now it's worth pressing? I find that change of mind somewhat suspect, Jim. However, I've got nothing to hide, so let's have my rebuttal.
Yep.
When Dariush got into a fight with me, you said you had
pretty much the same case, then took the time to point that yours was better worded as if to say "don't look at him, you might see how shitty it is. Look at mine instead". Parrot much, Jim?
So, after using a self-proclaimed pointless case and a borrowed case on me, you then sat back and watched NUKE obvjester it up. You seemed awfully convinced this was all a ploy by NUKE to get Dariush lynched, but then you VOTE him at the day's end, AND request a shorten. You were literally the last person in town to join that bandwagon, and had no reason to: Dariush had a majority of votes, so it's not like you were breaking the tie after changing your mind about him. You switched votes to fit in with the crowd and look town since suspicion had shifted off me, AGAIN. "Damn it, I can't mislynch McArathos, so I'd better switch to the convenient target so no one notices!"
For someone who's so DAMN certain I'm the leader, you sure as shit don't give two fucks about lynching ANYBODY else instead once I'm out of the running. Why would you, though? Any townie will do, so no point in pushing the case on me when you can just look town and rack up another kill.