Okay, so let me see if I get this. Yesterday, after a thorough battery of questioning, you tell me "you don't have anything on (me) anyway", yet decide FIRST THING this morning that, hey, actually, you do after all? There's nothing different from your case you already dismissed yourself, yet now it's worth pressing? I find that change of mind somewhat suspect, Jim. However, I've got nothing to hide, so let's have my rebuttal.
Yep.
1. Overly explaining things: I'm wordy, no denials there. I fail to see how trying my hardest to be clear, thorough, and transparent in my reasoning is scummy. I'm letting you guys get a nice, fat read on me with every juicy, detailed post. It would be WIFOM to openly state that I cannot be scum because of this, but I would like to know why it's a scumtell instead of a town tell or just, hell, my meta? You personally have told me in several games to tone down the length of my replies, so it's nothing new.
It's nice of you to bring your meta into this since I was just about to do the same.
Why did you bring your meta into this?
Oh, right, you're trying to preempt my accusations because you're privately freaking the fuck out about my argument.
I was going to bring up
this post from Witches' Coven, wherein you make a passionate speech of your hatred of all things NUKE9.13 and a fierce condemnation of everything he did as scum in a mighty two page diatribe. I told you to dial it back, because it was way too much. It was scummy then and it's scummy now.
You
are overdoing it.
2. Not treading on anyone's opinion. Sure, I guess. Oh, except for the fact I've been arguing with you, Dariush, and NUKE all throughout Day 1, and even pressed NUKE for a bit after the wagon was shifting away from him. Toaster didn't interest me, and I didn't see a point in getting involved in Max and Native's pissing contest. I'm hardly along there, so I think it's a tad untrue to say I'm gingerly avoiding conflict.
For the people you're arguing with, you're very diplomatic. I mean, for fuck's sake,
the guy from Scanners? That's overdoing it. That's really overdoing it.
I would have been fine with a simpler explanation without all the frills you put in your post, but no, you were very kind in your explanation and made sure to politely inform me of the ways I was wrong.
3. Being extremely careful with my vote. This one is straight up bullshit, Jim. You know that careless voting, and not really giving a damn who gets lynched is a MAJOR scumtell. Town should ALWAYS be careful with their votes, because Town have something to lose with a mislynch. You can't deny if I was being reckless and flippant with my vote you'd call it scummy, so why is the exact opposite a scumtell? You're putting me in a lose-lose situation with this so-called scumtell Jim. Why would you do that, when you know better?
Not what you're being careful about.
You're making sure that everybody will be fine with your vote before you cast it, by FoSing them well in advance, for example, and a bunch of other preparatory moves that are pretty obvious. Mostly though, the bullshit FoSes that you cast towards people getting attacked by others.
In any case, Urist is scum for the same reasons as yesterday.
Which are what, again?
Allow me to answer that.
I don't remember asking
you what Dariush's argument was.
You're nervous. It's the only explanation for why you went out of your way to answer Dariush's question and fill it full with petty snipes. If Dariush is as scummy as you'd have us believe then you're overreacting by going out of your way to answer a question not directed at you.
Hang, scum.
NativeForeigner and
Toaster, what's your read on Urist_McArathos? And why aren't you voting him for the reasons I'm listing?