Dariush/Toaster: I don't see what either of you mean. I unvoted, then a few hours later responded to Max and Jim and Dariush, and voted. If you're asking why there was a delay between my Unvote and reaction, its because I was shocked, and was expecting a counterclaim. I was certain it was a bluff, because I thought it was a terrible idea. I appear to be wrong, and had to re-evaluate my stance.
Toaster: Okay, I'm pretty sure Jack and you responded to Dariush's behavior in some places. First, his
too Town fallacy, which included arguing that I was too precise in my response, with how I addressed everything point by point in neatly formatted quotes. This is also known as what everyone does, pretty much always. So, because he claims I didn't need to be so clear and concise (an opinion I don't share), that made it scummy. Because clear cases and logical behavior are scumtells now, apparently. Despite you and Jack BOTH pointing out this fallacy, and my pointing out he was wrong in saying I had no case on NUKE, he
defended the fallacy as a legitimate point, then accused me of lurking, a charge I deny (and sorta hypocritical coming from a prodded player).
As for Max, what's to cite? He was absent enough for a prod, and I'd asked what he planned to when he was back. I thought
this accusing people of refusing to vote Jim business was a weak, flailing type reply, but again, not enough yet to justify a vote.
Jack: Likewise, not sure what you meant. You cited the post I researched and wrote while waiting for a counterclaim.