If nuke hasn't responded to my post by monday, I'm voting him.
Three days is more than enough time to answer that question.
NUKE. I keep my word.
There is literally no excuse for not answering me.
Here. I'll quote it for you.
Not sure if you've noticed, but Dariush? Kind of a dick.
It was not an OMGUS. I had my reasons, which are clearly stated.
Overreacted? He overreacted first.
Just because someone else did it first doesn't make it any less scummy.
Yes it does. Overreacting to an underreaction is stupid; overreacting to an overreaction is slightly less stupid.
To clarify: the active, posting part of scumhunting involves two things: pressuring people to get better reads, and exposing what leads you have found so that others can think about them. Neither of these things were applicable.
You were doing neither of those things. Why weren't they applicable, because everyone was focusing on flavor hunting? That doesn't change anything. You can still scumhunt while others are flavor hunting.
No, they weren't applicable, because I had no one to apply them to.
Nuke AND Dariush: That's only a scumslip if I actually have huge holes in my flavor.
But of course.
Do you have huge holes in your flavour? Who can tell. Certainly you wouldn't admit to it. I will confess right now to not being a flavour cop, so I have no way of finding out, either.
I've posted a lot of my flavor; the only things i have left out are things that would make my role obvious.
So you say. Do you honestly not understand the concept that scum might
lie about their flavor.In other words, you are now defending yourself with... not even WIFOM, worse than that. This isn't a defence, this is just you saying 'maybe this isn't the case'.
...That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying 'prove that this is the case'. That I'm scum trying to keep people from looking at my flavor because it is full of massive holes. If you can prove the second part of that sentence, it recursively proves that I'm scum.
Burden of Proof. Its a fallacy. Don't use it.
I'm not saying that your flavour is obviously full of holes; I am saying that on closer inspection (eg flavorcops) it might prove to be full of holes.
And it doesn't explain how you can be certain that the scum do not have any huge holes in their flavour, which is the actual main point of the argument.
I didn't see any huge holes in anyone's flavor.
Neither did I. But I'm not going to take that and assume that there
are no huge holes in anyone's flavour. Because that would be scummy.
Sorry for not answering you, but it just wasn't a very interesting set of questions. The answers should be obvious to anyone.
It is obviously a clever reference to Wine In Front Of Me (I even use the same poison- Iocane powder (among the more deadly poisons known to man))
Haha, nice joke!
...
Wait, you're serious? You're seriously offering a reference to a random novel as argument to your innocence? How... just... What.
Actually, the scene from the movie is more well known, I think.
It is that scene from whence the phrase 'Wine In Front Of Me' is lifted. Every time you use the phrase WIFOM, you are referring to what Westley pulls in that scene. So, yeah. It is appropriate.
It isn't an argument for my innocence, you tool, it is a counterpoint to you thinking my poisoning of wine is ridiculous.
Nuke and Jack:
Wine merchant, by definition, sells wine. How would a wine merchant POISON someone else's wine?! By sneaking up to them in the night, offering free wine that incidentally is poisoned? And the... offeree will immediatly drink it?
Look, guy, really?
I am a wine merchant. I know about wine. I know about slipping poisons into wine. Yes. What I do is offer someone some free wine, which is poisoned. They drink it, because I am clearly a wine merchant, offering free samples. I assume- it isn't even spelt out in my role PM- It just says that I have a once-per-game night action which will poison someone's wine with Iocane powder (one of the more deadly poisons known to man), killing them.
I honestly don't understand how you could possibly not understand this.