Posting because people have no reason to shit all over a thread for a perfectly acceptable usage of a word simply because the original and mostly obsolete definition is not the same as the current one.
While I see your point, and I did indeed only
enter the thread because my Spider-Grammar-Nazi sense was tingling, I feel a bit miffed that you replied to make this counter-point in response to the post in which I deliberately made sure had thread-specific information in it. Don't know if it helped (not heard if there seasonal saves provided an embark save, but by now I'm assuming not), but it was intended to be relevent.
OP? There is no reason to say it doesn't equal annihilate either, since the usage here is not the same as annihilate's.
Maybe not (close though... just one survivor, if I read correctly), but that's what a lot of people use both words for anyway (i.e. perhaps survivor), and both (IM[H?]O) in error. And I make no apologies for informing the public that a word has been misappropriated these last few centuries or so. I'd expect exactly the same treatment in return. I almost expect it every time I use words such as "while" (for some meaning "during", but for others it is "until"), and I'm sure there's holes to be picked in most of my missives (especially this one), if you're of a mind to do so, and quite probably I'll be happy to be improved.
Anyway... I've never had fire-snake fire-starting (not actually noticed firesnakes in .31 games, at all, but as they're vermin they're easily missed I suppose), but it is something that I know of that
may have happened, or perhaps a convenient explanation for something else (e.g. whatever caused this situation) that never got properly identified.