Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

What is your affiliated political party? (U.S.)

Republican
- 5 (6%)
Democrat
- 8 (9.5%)
Libertarian
- 11 (13.1%)
Undecided/Independent
- 38 (45.2%)
Other (Anarchist, Communist, Green, ect.)
- 22 (26.2%)

Total Members Voted: 84


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 19

Author Topic: Political Debate (U.S.)  (Read 17494 times)

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2011, 07:09:39 pm »

This thread seems to be a place where you look for other libertarians, since it is not as though you have advanced any topics for debate or responded to anything anyone was actually saying.

If that is so, perhaps it should be repurposed.
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

DeathsDisciple

  • Bay Watcher
  • He's nice (on the inside)
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2011, 07:10:19 pm »

Well, I voted other. I completely agree with Libertarian philosophy as I understand it, I just find that I almost never agree with the party's policies. That's often because I'm okay with a government that is powerful in many ways, because it's often the least terrible option as far as keeping people free goes. This also means that I'm okay with higher taxes, particularly on the wealthy (again, lesser evil).
My friend, that is not Libertarian. Government can not do anything right. I believe that the Government should only protect us from the Evil Communists from China.
Logged
"And I believe that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph again." - George Orwell
My YouTube Channel.

DeathsDisciple

  • Bay Watcher
  • He's nice (on the inside)
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #17 on: September 05, 2011, 07:12:21 pm »

This thread seems to be a place where you look for other libertarians, since it is not as though you have advanced any topics for debate or responded to anything anyone was actually saying.

If that is so, perhaps it should be repurposed.
Very sorry about that.

Very well! What are your views on Gun Control!
*This is for everyone*
Logged
"And I believe that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph again." - George Orwell
My YouTube Channel.

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #18 on: September 05, 2011, 07:14:29 pm »

Oh boy, here comes this thread again.

I'm for Philosopher Kings, as long as I get to be king!

I really wish I knew the wording to that Nietzsche quote, that no matter the specifics, every philosopher who imagines an ideal government imagines himself at its head.  I consider it a truism for all discussion of politics.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

DeathsDisciple

  • Bay Watcher
  • He's nice (on the inside)
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #19 on: September 05, 2011, 07:23:05 pm »

My views on Gun Control:
I believe that we should be able to have any type of weapon at your home and be able to conceal any type of handgun in public.
After all statistics show that more guns=less crime.

Proof?
http://polyticks.com/polyticks/beararms/liars/moreguns.htm

Debate, Debate, Debate!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me the Error in the other link. I assure you I have read every other link though.
Forgive me for the additionalerror in the hyper-link. I'm getting very rusty these days with computers.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2011, 05:12:19 pm by DeathsDisciple »
Logged
"And I believe that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph again." - George Orwell
My YouTube Channel.

Bauglir

  • Bay Watcher
  • Let us make Good
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #20 on: September 05, 2011, 07:28:58 pm »

My friend, that is not Libertarian. Government can not do anything right. I believe that the Government should only protect us from the Evil Communists from China.
And yet I believe that individual freedom is the highest good a government (or any authoritative body) can promote. My understanding is that this is the philosophical basis on which stands Libertarianism, and the reasoning used to arrive at policies they have.

As for gun control:

Yes, provided effective regulation (stricter requirements for more extremely effective weapons). The licensing procedure for a handgun? Just contact information and not having committed a felony. A nuclear arsenal? A majority vote on the part of the citizens of your nation certifying your reliability and trustworthiness to handle the responsibility, along with a thorough background check.

What? If it's good enough to determine who gets to be President, I'm sure it's good enough for this >_____>
Logged
In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6.
“What are you doing?”, asked Minsky. “I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe” Sussman replied. “Why is the net wired randomly?”, asked Minsky. “I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play”, Sussman said.
Minsky then shut his eyes. “Why do you close your eyes?”, Sussman asked his teacher.
“So that the room will be empty.”
At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #21 on: September 05, 2011, 07:29:00 pm »

Everyone should be able to carry any weapon they want, wherever they want. If they want to carry around a personal nuclear missile, let them.
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."

quinnr

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2011, 07:32:06 pm »

Everyone should be able to carry any weapon they want, wherever they want. If they want to carry around a personal nuclear missile, let them.

Yes, carrying around nuclear bombs to the grocery store is always a great idea.
Logged
To exist or not exist, that is the query. For whether it is more optimal of the CPU to endure the viruses and spam of outragous fortune, or to something something something.

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2011, 07:33:20 pm »

Would guarantee no crime. Actually, better idea. Permanently wire a thermonuclear device to everyone which is set to go off if they are threatened.
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."

Bauglir

  • Bay Watcher
  • Let us make Good
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2011, 07:33:43 pm »

To be fair, it would be all but impossible to detonate them in the grocery store while you're carrying them around. Even deliberately.
Logged
In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6.
“What are you doing?”, asked Minsky. “I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe” Sussman replied. “Why is the net wired randomly?”, asked Minsky. “I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play”, Sussman said.
Minsky then shut his eyes. “Why do you close your eyes?”, Sussman asked his teacher.
“So that the room will be empty.”
At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2011, 07:36:20 pm »

Would guarantee no crime.

You make an assumption of universal rationality and self-awareness.
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2011, 07:38:47 pm »

No. Just that when all the cities are levelled, there will be no crime.
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."

quinnr

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2011, 07:39:27 pm »

Would guarantee no crime.

You make an assumption of universal rationality and self-awareness.

This.

Or on the other hand [ninja'd]:

No. Just that when all the cities are levelled, there will be no crime.
Logged
To exist or not exist, that is the query. For whether it is more optimal of the CPU to endure the viruses and spam of outragous fortune, or to something something something.

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2011, 07:40:04 pm »

... I'm sorry, I thought that someone who wants to become a priest would value human life somewhat more than that implies.
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Political Debate (U.S.)
« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2011, 07:40:07 pm »

I don't have a party because I am not American.

Does that mean I am EVIL?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 19